神父马克西姆:心念与心理健康——东正教的视角

讲座日期: St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church, Toronto, April 9, 2016 作者: ephremyuan 151 分钟阅读 37198 字
目录
  • 按:这是神父马克西姆(Fr. Maximos Constas)于2016年4月9日在多伦多圣尼古拉希腊东正教会(St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church)的讲座,讲题为「我们的心念与心理健康:东正教的视角」(Our Thoughts and Mental Health: An Orthodox Perspective),由希腊正教加拿大都主教区主办。本文为中英双语对照文本,由阿甲整理『若整理和翻译有任何问题,欢迎指正』。

若要引用本文,ephremyuan,《神父马克西姆:心念与心理健康——东正教的视角》(伦敦:光从东方来,2026年08月31日),本网页网址,引用日期。也请参考版权申明

油管订阅,以及

「请进入学术讲座文件夹」。

神父马克西姆:心念与心理健康——东正教的视角


English (Original)
中文 (翻译)

Thank you. Let’s try that again. Your Grace, Bishop Christoforos, Father Maximus, Reverend Fathers, distinguished guests, family, and friends, good evening. My name is Evagelos Sotiropoulos, and I want to welcome you. It’s a great honor to do so to this beautiful Church of Saint Nicholas here in Scarborough. With the blessings of His Eminence Metropolitan Sotirios, we’re very fortunate and blessed to have our Second Annual Lenten Spiritual Homily that will be delivered this evening by Father Maximus on the subject of “Our Thoughts and Mental Health: An Orthodox Perspective.” Just as a housekeeping matter, our Parish Council will distribute small sheets of paper in the next few minutes for the question and answer session that will follow the homily. Feel free to write any questions that you may have, and we’ll circulate them for the Q&A following Father’s homily. I would like to now call upon Father Fanourios, our parish priest here at St. Nicholas, to introduce our keynote speaker and our distinguished guest. Thank you.

谢谢。让我们再来一次。阁下,克里斯托弗洛斯主教,马克西姆神父,可敬的神父们,尊贵的客人们,家人朋友们,晚上好。我叫埃万盖洛斯·索蒂罗普洛斯,我想欢迎大家。能在士嘉堡这座美丽的圣尼古拉教会这样做,是莫大的荣幸。承蒙索蒂里奥斯都主教阁下的祝福,我们非常幸运且有福分,拥有第二届大斋期灵修讲道,今晚将由马克西姆神父就“我们的念头与心理健康:一个东正教的视角”这一主题进行演讲。作为一件后勤事项,我们的堂区议会将在接下来的几分钟内分发小纸片,用于讲道后的问答环节。请随意写下您可能有的任何问题,我们将在神父讲道后的问答环节传阅它们。我现在想请我们圣尼古拉这里的本堂神父法努里奥斯神父,介绍我们的主旨演讲嘉宾和尊贵客人。谢谢。

Thank you. Theophilestate, panosilogiotati. Dear brothers and sisters, dear children, as the frozen tree, especially in Canada, seeks the spring sun, like the dried flower seeks the fresh water of the rain, like the hungry stomach seeks the bread, like the bird seeks its prey, so in the same way, God, You have entrusted our souls. He seeks through this blessed period of the Great Lent; He seeks the warm sun, the great rain, her food, our soul that is so hungry and thirsty and so hungry with her care. And yet we are so much in awe of her need, this blessed period of the Great Lent. And this is the reason, O Lord, that I believe and feel that we share the same feeling and the same need, the same hunger and the same thirst. And this is what brought us all here tonight, gathered here. As a group of people with the same need, the same hunger, and the same spiritual thirst, you have come to fulfill this hunger and this thirst, and to fulfill it tonight. And we thank and bless God for your presence, that we have you in the blessed Temple of Saint Nicholas, to be able to express ourselves in comforting, theological, academic, and prayerful words so that we may be able to take a little of the food we need from your lips in order to reach and complete the journey of the Great Lent. So, the blessing and the Seventh Dias of the Honourable Prime Minister. We have you here tonight. We welcome you to Canada, to Toronto, and to Saint Nicholas, and we invite you all together, homophonously, to the… Welcome, Your Excellency. I will read only in English your biographical note.

谢谢。Theophilestate, panosilogiotati(蒙上帝所爱的,最可敬的)。亲爱的兄弟姐妹们,亲爱的孩子们,正如冻结的树木,尤其是在加拿大,寻求春天的阳光,如同干枯的花朵寻求雨水的清泉,如同饥饿的胃寻求面包,如同鸟儿寻求猎物,同样地,上帝,您托付了我们的灵魂。祂通过大斋期这蒙福的时期寻求;祂寻求温暖的阳光,大雨,她的食物,我们那如此饥渴且如此渴望祂关怀的灵魂。然而,我们对她的需求如此敬畏,大斋期这蒙福的时期。这就是原因,哦主,我相信并感到我们分享同样的感受和同样的需求,同样的饥渴和同样的渴。这就是今晚把我们所有人聚集在这里的原因。作为一群有着同样需求、同样饥渴和同样属灵渴的人,你们来到这里是为了满足这饥渴和渴,并在今晚满足它。我们感谢并祝福上帝你们的到来,我们在圣尼古拉圣殿有你们,能够用安慰的、神学的、学术的和祈祷的话语表达我们自己,以便我们能够从你们的嘴唇上获取一点我们需要的食物,以完成大斋期的旅程。所以,祝福和尊敬的总理的第七迪亚斯。我们今晚有你们在这里。我们欢迎来到加拿大,多伦多,和圣尼古拉,我们邀请大家一起,异口同声地,向… 欢迎,阁下。我将只用英文宣读您的传记笔记。

The Very Reverend Father Maximus Constance. He is a senior research scholar at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology in Boston. He holds a Ph.D. in Patristics and Historical Theology from the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. For many years, he was a professor at Harvard Divinity School, after which he became a monk at Simonopetra at Mount Athos. He is the author of The Art of Seeing: Paradox and Perception in Orthodox Iconography, an edition and translation of Maximus the Confessor’s Ambigua, and Proclus of Constantinople and the Cult of the Virgin in Late Antiquity, as well as numerous articles and translations. His work focuses on the patristic and Byzantine theological tradition, Orthodox spirituality, the history of the reception of biblical and patristic sources in the late Byzantine era, and the theological study of Byzantine art, icons, and iconography. Archimandrite Father Maximus was ordained deacon on the Feast of Saint Nicholas in 2015 and shortly after was ordained a priest. Both ordinations were presided over by Archbishop Geron Dimitrios of America.

可敬的马克西姆·康斯坦斯神父。他是波士顿圣十字架希腊东正教神学院的高级研究学者。他拥有华盛顿特区美国天主教大学的教父学与历史神学博士学位。多年来,他是哈佛神学院的教授,之后成为阿索斯山西莫诺佩特拉的修士。他是《观看的艺术:东正教圣像画中的悖论与感知》、认信者马克西姆的《Ambigua》的编辑和翻译,以及《君士坦丁堡的普罗克洛斯与古代晚期的圣母崇拜》的作者,以及众多文章和翻译。他的作品专注于教父和拜占庭神学传统、东正教灵性、圣经和教父来源在拜占庭晚期接受的历史,以及拜占庭艺术、圣像和圣像画的神学研究。修院院长马克西姆神父于 2015 年圣尼古拉节被祝圣为辅祭,不久后被祝圣为神父。两次祝圣均由美洲大主教杰龙·季米特里奥斯主持。

Your Grace, it’s good to see you again. Father, thank you for those kind words of introduction. And Vangelie, I don’t see him. I’m sure he’s there. He is managing certain things. Thank you for your hospitality and for helping arrange this event. Of course, I’m happy to begin by thanking His Eminence, Metropolitan Sotirios, who, because of other business, could not be here with us this evening. But I would like to publicly thank him for this opportunity and for his friendship and for his support over the years. Some of you might remember that I was here—was it a year ago? I don’t remember exactly—but there was an event in this church actually, and it’s a blessing to be back. As Father Fanourios mentioned, I was ordained to the diaconate and the priesthood on the feast day, while I was ordained a deacon on the feast day of Saint Nicholas. And before I became a monk and received the name of Maximus, my name, my baptismal name, was Nicholas. So it’s a double blessing for me to be in this Church of St. Nicholas. I’ve been to your church before, but this is the first time that I’ve been here for an actual service. And it’s such a lovely environment. It’s such a beautiful environment. It’s such a peaceful environment that I feel a little reluctant to shatter the silence of the beautiful Vesper service with my words, but this is what you’ve invited me here to do, and that’s what I will do and

阁下,很高兴再次见到您。神父,谢谢您那些亲切的介绍话语。还有万盖利,我没看到他。我相信他在那里。他在管理某些事情。谢谢你的款待和帮助安排这次活动。当然,我很高兴首先感谢索蒂里奥斯都主教阁下,他因其他事务今晚不能与我们在一起。但我想公开感谢他给予这个机会,以及多年来他的友谊和支持。你们中有些人可能记得我曾在这里——是一年前吗?我不确切记得——但实际上在这教会里有一个活动,能回来是一种祝福。正如法努里奥斯神父提到的,我在节日那天被祝圣为辅祭职和神父职,而我在圣尼古拉节那天被祝圣为辅祭。在我成为修士并接受马克西姆这个名字之前,我的名字,我的洗礼名,是尼古拉。所以对我来说,能在圣尼古拉这教会是一种双重祝福。我以前来过你们的教会,但这是我第一次来这里参加实际的礼仪。这是一个如此可爱的环境。这是一个如此美丽的环境。这是一个如此宁静的环境,以至于我觉得有点不愿用我的话语打破美丽的晚祷礼的寂静,但这就是你们邀请我来这里做的,这也是我将要做的,并且…

As you heard, I’ve been asked to say a few words about the whole question or the whole problem of our thoughts. Now, thoughts in English, I suppose, means one thing, but in Greek, there’s a very specific word here, logismi. It’s not skeptis, it’s logismi. So the thoughts that we’re talking about here are logismi, which are a very particular kind of mental phenomenon, let’s say. They’re not thoughts that we ordinarily have; there’s something very different, and often they’re translated as negative thoughts. Logismi can often be translated as negative thoughts or thoughts that emerge or arise from our passions. Logismi—we’ll say more about what the passions are, or if the logismi are not coming from passions. They are leading us to the passions. They are the thoughts that are promoting us in some way towards sin and towards passion. So those are the kinds of thoughts that we are going to be speaking about this evening. Is there a problem? Can everyone hear me? Am I audible? It sounds good from where I’m standing. I flew up from Boston this morning and my head is a little stuffed from the air travel, so I hope you can hear me a little better than I can hear myself.

正如你们所听到的,有人请我就关于我们念头的整个问题或整个难题说几句话。现在,我想“念头”在英语中意味着一件事,但在希腊语中,这里有一个非常具体的词,logismi。不是 skeptis,是 logismi。所以我们这里谈论的念头是 logismi,这是一种非常特殊的心理现象,可以说。它们不是我们通常拥有的念头;有些非常不同的东西,往往它们被翻译为消极念头。Logismi 往往可以翻译为消极念头,或从我们情欲中产生或兴起的念头。Logismi——我们会多说一些情欲是什么,或者 logismi 是否不是来自情欲。它们正引导我们走向情欲。它们是某种方式上推动我们走向罪和走向情欲的念头。所以这些就是我们今晚要谈论的那种念头。有问题吗?大家都能听到我吗?我能被听见吗?从我站的地方听起来不错。我今天早上从波士顿飞过来,因为航空旅行我的头有点堵,所以我希望你们能比我听自己声音更清楚地听到我。

It seems fair to say, it seems clear to say that we live—and this is really, it’s our curse and it’s our blessing—we live in a troubled world. We live in a troubled world. It’s hard to turn on the news or look at a newspaper and not be upset, not be unsettled. The source of the troubles that we see, the origin of the troubles that we see, the root of the troubles that we see, is our own troubled self. Everything that we see externally, everything that we see outwardly in the world, is a manifestation, is a projection of the things that we have within us. If there is greed within us, if there is hatred within us, if there is resentment within us, if there is anger within us, if there is whatever it is, this is what will be manifested within the world. So I can only attribute the troubled nature of our world today to the troubled nature of the self, to our own inner—it’s our own inner turmoil—that has been projected out into the world, into the things that we see. Apostolos Pavlos—I’m sorry, Apostolos Iakovos—in the letter of James, James asks the question, what is the source of the wars and the conflicts among you? Is it not your lusts? Is it not your passions that are at war in your members—in other words, in your own self? You desire and you do not have, so you kill. And you covet, but you cannot obtain, so you fight and you wage war. Πόθεν πόλεμη, από πού η πόλεμη, και πόθεν μάχαι εν ημίν, από πού είναι αυτά που βλέπουμε μέσα μας, ούκεν δεύθεν, δεν είναι από εκεί, εκ των ιδωνών ημών, των στρατευομένων εν της μέλεσης ημών. You desire and you don’t have. You want things and you don’t have them. You don’t have them and you shout. And you will have to say it, Apostolos.

可以说公平,可以说清楚,我们生活在——这真的是,它是我们的诅咒也是我们的祝福——我们生活在一个动荡的世界。我们生活在一个动荡的世界。很难打开新闻或看报纸而不感到不安,不感到 unsettled。我们所看到的 troubles 的源头,我们所看到的 troubles 的起源,我们所看到的 troubles 的根源,是我们自己动荡的自我。我们在外部看到的一切,我们在世界 outwardly 看到的一切,都是我们内在事物的一种显现,一种投射。如果我们里面有贪婪,如果我们里面有憎恨,如果我们里面有怨恨,如果我们里面有愤怒,如果里面有无论什么,这就是将在世界中显现的。所以我只能将我们要今天世界的动荡本性归因于自我的动荡本性,归因于我们自己的内在——是我们自己的内在 turmoil——被投射到了外部世界,投射到了我们要看到的事物中。Apostolos Pavlos——抱歉,Apostolos Iakovos——在雅各书中,雅各问道,你们中间的争战和冲突是从哪里来的呢?岂不是从你们的色欲吗?岂不是从你们肢体中交战的情欲吗——换句话说,在你们自己的自我中?你们贪恋却得不着,所以你们杀害。你们嫉妒却不能得,所以你们争战斗殴。Πόθεν πόλεμη, από πού η πόλεμη, και πόθεν μάχαι εν ημίν, από πού είναι αυτά που βλέπουμε μέσα μας, ούκεν δεύθεν, δεν είναι από εκεί, εκ των ιδωνών ημών, των στρατευομένων εν της μέλεσης ημών。你们贪恋却得不着。你们想要事物却得不到。你们得不到它们,于是你们喊叫。而你们不得不说它,Apostolos。

We’re distracted by things around us. We’re distracted by the news and by the troubled times that we live in and all of the unusual and disturbing things that we see. And I think this is a dangerous thing for us because it distracts us from our own self. It distracts us from our own inner depth, and we end up living externally. We end up living superficially and not from our own inner depth. Somebody once said—I don’t know the source of the quotation, but somebody once said—that every depth has a surface, but not every surface has a depth, which is why we should attend to the depth of things and not to the surface. Right? God got the vassals epiphany. So this is, I think, part of the Christian life, part of the spiritual life, and not even just part of the Christian or the spiritual life, but it’s part of a normal and a healthy, I think, human life. A normal, human, healthy, psychological, emotional, and spiritual life does not involve being externally oriented all the time, and living outside of yourself, and being distracted and reactive and all these kinds of things. But it means to live from your center. It means to live from your inner depth, to live richly and deeply and with deliberation from your own self, and not to be at the mercy of—right, what’s the… galemos? I don’t know the quote. We read… that’s blown about by every wind of change that comes through. We can’t be that person. We can’t be that person. We have to have an inner stability. But we have a problem. We have a problem when we try to enter into ourselves. We have a problem when we try to move from the external to the internal, from the outward to the inner. And what is that problem? That problem is that our minds are easily distracted. Our minds are easily distracted. We often find it difficult to pay attention for more than a few minutes. We often find it difficult to pay attention.

我们被周围的事物分心。我们被新闻和我们所生活的动荡时代以及我们看到的所有不寻常和令人不安的事物分心。我认为这对我们来说是危险的,因为它使我们从自己的自我分心。它使我们从自己的内在深度分心,我们最终生活在外部。我们最终生活在表面上,而不是从我们自己的内在深度生活。有人曾经说过——我不知道这句话的出处,但有人曾经说过——每一个深度都有一个表面,但并非每一个表面都有深度,这就是为什么我们应该关注事物的深度而不是表面。对吧?上帝赋予了器皿神显。所以我认为,这是基督徒生活的一部分,属灵生活的一部分,甚至不仅仅是基督徒或属灵生活的一部分,它是正常和健康人类生活的一部分。我想,正常、人类、健康、心理、情感和属灵生活并不涉及一直向外定向,生活在你自己之外,being distracted 和 reactive 以及所有这类事情。但这意味着从你的中心生活。这意味着从你的内在深度生活,从你自己丰富、深刻且深思熟虑地生活,而不是任由——对吧,是什么……galemos?我不知道这句话。我们读过……被随随便便的风吹动。我们不能成为那个人。我们不能成为那个人。我们必须有内在的稳定性。但我们有一个问题。当我们试图进入我们自己时,我们有一个问题。当我们试图从外部转向内部,从 outward 转向 inner 时,我们有一个问题。那是什么问题?问题是我们的心灵很容易分心。我们的心灵很容易分心。我们经常发现很难保持专注超过几分钟。我们经常发现很难保持专注。

As can be seen, for example, in the precipitous rise of various attention deficit disorders, which were largely unheard of five or ten or fifteen years ago, and now millions of people of all kinds of ages—not simply children or adolescents, but older and older people—are being diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and related kinds of disorders. This is a disorder that’s not… It’s ADD, ADHD. It is not caused by a virus, right? It’s a social problem. It’s not a genetic or a chromosomal or a viral. It’s not caused by a microbe. It’s a social disorder. And of course, if you put children in environments where they’re distracted by all kinds of electronic gadgets, of course they’re going to have a hard time focusing. Of course, they’re going to have a hard time concentrating and focusing. But we have this weakness. We’re always seeking something. The mind is always in motion. The mind is always striving, seeking, searching, demanding, wanting, craving. Most of us have

例如,正如各种专注力缺失症的急剧上升所示,这些病症在五年、十年或十五年前 largely unheard of,而现在数百万各种年龄的人——不仅仅是儿童或青少年,而是越来越老的人——被诊断为专注力缺失症和相关类型的障碍。这是一种不是……它是 ADD,ADHD。它不是由病毒引起的,对吧?这是一个社会问题。它不是遗传或染色体或病毒性的。它不是由微生物引起的。这是一个社会障碍。当然,如果你把孩子们放在被各种电子 gadgets 分心的环境中,当然他们很难聚焦。当然,他们很难集中和专注。但我们有这个弱点。我们总是在寻求什么。心灵总是在运动。心灵总是在奋斗、寻求、搜索、要求、想要、渴望。我们大多数人都有

Televisions probably with remote controls and other gadgets that give us access to maybe more than 100 channels, and you can sit there and channel surf—that’s the phrase, right?—and go through hundreds and still not find anything worth watching. Or you go to… we go to our refrigerators, and our refrigerators are filled with food, and there’s nothing in there for us to eat. Or you go to, I don’t know, Netflix to find a movie, and you spend 25 minutes looking for a movie to watch and you don’t find anything. So all of this excess, all of this abundance, actually doesn’t fulfill us, but it actually leaves us feeling more empty. A refrigerator full of food and there’s nothing to eat. A television full of movies and there’s nothing to watch. I mean, we’re all hungry. We’re all hungry. And all of this searching, all of this craving, all of this wanting, all of this restlessness, and we never seem to ask ourselves what… Are we seeking? We just accept the fact that we’re craving creatures, that we’re looking, searching, striving, wanting, never happy, never satisfied, always wanting. We never ask ourselves why or what exactly are we looking for? Why are we so restless? Why are we always searching? Why are we… I mean, take the channel surfing as a metaphor or an allegory for your life, right? How come you can’t find the channel that’s supposed to be your life? Why is it all right? It’s this built-in kind of discontent or unhappiness. Why is it so hard for us to remain quietly at home? Why is it so hard for us to remain at home, let’s say, in our room? Why is it so difficult for us to take a solitary walk without the gadgets and the telephones and the earbuds and that, right? Why do we find it so difficult? What prevents us from being at rest? What prevents us from being at rest? Why are we so restless? We simply accept the fact of our restlessness. We never question it. And I think we need to.

电视机大概配有遥控器和其他小工具,让我们能收看超过 100 个频道,你可以坐在那里换台——是这么说的吧?——换了几百个频道,仍然找不到值得看的东西。或者你走向……我们走向冰箱,冰箱里装满了食物,却没有什么可吃的。或者你去,比方说,Netflix 找部电影,花了 25 分钟找电影看,却什么也没找到。所以所有这些过剩,所有这些丰富,实际上并不能满足我们,反而让我们感到更加空虚。冰箱里装满食物,却没什么可吃。电视机里全是电影,却没什么可看。我的意思是,我们都饿了。我们都饿了。而所有这些寻找,所有这些渴望,所有这些想要,所有这些不安,我们似乎从未问自己……我们在寻求什么?我们只是接受这样一个事实:我们是渴望的受造物,我们在寻找、搜寻、奋斗、想要,从不快乐,从不满足,总是想要。我们从未问自己为什么,或者我们到底在找什么?为什么我们如此不安?为什么我们总是在寻找?为什么我们……我的意思是,把换台当作你生活的隐喻或寓言,对吧?为什么你找不到本该是你生活的那个频道?为什么就是这样呢?这是一种内置的不满或不快乐。为什么我们很难安静地待在家里?为什么我们很难待在家里,比如说,待在我们的房间里?为什么我们很难不带小工具、电话和耳机独自散步,对吧?为什么我们觉得这么难?是什么阻止我们安息?是什么阻止我们安息?为什么我们如此不安?我们只是接受我们不安的事实。我们从未质疑它。我认为我们需要质疑。

Another question: why are we so enamored? Earlier I spoke about the depth and the surface, the batheos and the epiphaneia, right? The depth and the surface. Why are we so enamored of surfaces? Why are we so enamored of surfaces? We have become very superficial people. It’s all about appearances, right? Whether it’s politics, whether it’s in our own self-presentation to other people, we look… we seem to be fixated, focused on, enamored of, obsessed with surfaces. Surfaces: the way things look, not the way things are. And we’re easily deceived, time and again, by surface appearances. Even in relationships, we look at people and we see the surface of them. Sometimes people fall in love with other people because of the way their eyebrows look, or because of the color of their hair, or some other superficial physical characteristic that brings people together. But there’s no foundation for a relationship there. The surface is just the surface. It used to be an old saying, “Don’t judge a book by its cover.” That’s exactly the kind of society we’ve become. I’m not Canadian, I’m not from Canada. I think maybe what I’m saying is more relevant to the US, where I think America is supposed to be ahead of Canada all the time, and we’re certainly ahead of you in terms of being superficial and shallow in terms of our culture, and our aesthetics, and our politics, and many other things. So much of what I’m saying comes from an American kind of background, but I think it’s also a very human problem, a very human problem. And my question is: why are we so enamored of the surface? Why are we so attached to surfaces?

另一个问题:为什么我们如此着迷?早些时候我谈到了深度和表面,即 bathos 和 epiphaneia,对吧?深度和表面。为什么我们如此迷恋表面?为什么我们如此迷恋表面?我们已经变成了非常肤浅的人。一切都是关于外表,对吧?无论是政治,还是我们向他人展示自己,我们看起来……我们似乎固着、聚焦、迷恋、执着于表面。表面:事物的样子,而不是事物的本质。我们一次又一次地容易被表面现象所欺骗。即使在关系中,我们看人也是看他们的表面。有时人们爱上别人是因为眉毛的样子,或者头发的颜色,或其他一些将人们聚集在一起的肤浅身体特征。但那里没有关系的基础。表面只是表面。过去有句老话,“不要以貌取人”。这正是我们变成的那种社会。我不是加拿大人,我不是来自加拿大。我想也许我所说的更与美国相关,我认为美国应该一直领先于加拿大,而且在文化、美学、政治和许多其他方面的肤浅和浅薄上,我们肯定领先于你们。我所说的很多内容来自一种美国背景,但我认为这也是一个非常人类的问题,一个非常人类的问题。我的问题是:为什么我们如此迷恋表面?为什么我们如此依恋表面?

And one possible answer could be that it’s because we’re afraid of the depth. We are afraid of depth. It satisfies us with some surface, some external surface, and it is enough for this thing to be beautiful, to be good, to be relaxing. But don’t be afraid of depth. Which maybe we’ve never encountered it, maybe we don’t know who we are very well, and rather than get into that, we’ll satisfy ourselves with superficial and external distractions. Still worse, still worse than being afraid of the depth: maybe we’re afraid of finding out that we don’t have a depth. That if I’ve spent my whole life attending to external superficial things, my face and my hair and my appearance and my clothing and the details of my home and so on and so on, right? All of these external things. Maybe I’ve neglected my own inner depth. And that’s why I don’t want to look inside. Or, for example, not to see the flaws or anything. Why should we go into this psychism? Because this makes it easier. This makes it easier. To look inside of yourself… It’s one thing to look inside of yourself and see something you’re not happy with. But it’s another thing to look inside of yourself and realize that you’re empty. That’s a frightening thing. That’s a frightening thing. And I think our lives are very empty, living in a materialistic and consumeristic and sort of scientific kind of culture where everything is reduced to physical phenomena. There is no longer the spirit, only the material, the external material surface of things. So, this idea of the restless, this kind of restless mind that we have, this is a human dilemma, it’s a human existential kind of a problem, and it’s been exacerbated by our modern society, by our modern culture. Why? Because there’s a very real sense in which the culture that we’ve created, the culture that we’ve created—I’m thinking primarily of digital culture and all of the electronic gadgets. I think I see someone in the back holding up an electronic gadget. I mean, they’re everywhere. People, right? I’m not singling you out, but the culture that we have created is really a culture of organized distractions.

一个可能的答案是,因为我们害怕深度。我们害怕深度。它用某种表面,某种外部表面来满足我们,这就足够让事物变得美丽、美好、令人放松。但不要害怕深度。也许我们从未遇到过它,也许我们不太了解自己,我们宁愿用肤浅和外部干扰来满足自己,也不愿深入其中。更糟的是,比害怕深度更糟的是:也许我们害怕发现自己没有深度。如果我一生都在关注外部肤浅的事物,我的脸、头发、外表、衣服、家里的细节等等,对吧?所有这些外部事物。也许我忽视了自己内在的深度。这就是为什么我不想向内看。或者,例如,不想看到缺陷或其他什么。我们为什么要进入这种心理主义?因为这更容易。这更容易。向内看自己……向内看自己看到你不满意的东西是一回事。但向内看自己并意识到你是空虚的,则是另一回事。那是可怕的事情。那是可怕的事情。我认为我们的生活非常空虚,生活在一种物质主义、消费主义和某种科学式的文化中,一切都被简化为物理现象。不再有灵,只有物质,事物的外部物质表面。所以,这种不安的观念,我们拥有的这种不安的心灵,这是一个人类的困境,这是一个人类存在主义的问题,并被我们的现代社会、现代文化所加剧。为什么?因为在某种意义上,我们创造的文化,我们创造的文化——我主要想到的是数字文化和所有电子小工具。我想我看到后面有人举着电子小工具。我的意思是,它们无处不在。人们,对吧?我不是单独挑出你,但我们创造的文化确实是一种有组织干扰的文化。

How can you possibly have a deep inner spiritual life if you’re constantly distracted by the 24-hour news cycle? Every 15 minutes, every day, there’s some new story, there’s some new event, there’s some new disruption, there’s some chaos. And it seems that the whole thing has been designed to distract us. One day it’s the missing airplane, the next day it’s some virus, the next day it’s some attack. And it’s in the interest of certain groups and others to keep us distracted from the depth of things and to keep us satisfied with superficial things. That’s a whole other issue; I’m not going to get into it. But it’s not by chance that society has evolved in this way. It’s to someone’s advantage that we’re being kept distracted and that we’re not encouraged to look within ourselves.

如果你 constantly 被 24 小时新闻周期所分心,你怎么可能拥有深层的内在属灵生活呢?每 15 分钟,每一天,都有一些新故事,一些新事件,一些新干扰,一些混乱。而且似乎整件事都被设计用来分散我们的注意力。一天是失踪的飞机,第二天是某种病毒,第三天是某种袭击。而且让某些群体和其他人保持对事物深度的分心,并让我们满足于表面事物,是符合他们的利益的。那是另一个问题;我不打算深入探讨。但社会以这种方式演变并非偶然。我们被保持分心且不被鼓励向内省察,这对某人是有利的。

So let us think for a moment about what our mind is doing most of the time. Now, there’s a lot of people here in the church tonight, and I’ve been speaking for maybe 10 minutes or so, and you might want to take a quick self-check and ask yourself where you’ve been in those 10 minutes. Have you even arrived here yet? Some of you still haven’t arrived. Physically you’re here, but spiritually, mentally, maybe you’re still at home, maybe you’re still at work. Maybe you’re thinking about a conversation you had, or maybe you got here, body and soul, but then now you’re thinking about, I hope he finishes quickly because I haven’t had my coffee this afternoon or I’ve got to make dinner. You went to Paris, I don’t know. Rarely are we present. We are not present.

所以让我们花点时间思考一下我们的心灵大部分时间在做什么。现在,今晚教会里有很多人,我已经讲了大概 10 分钟左右,你们可能想快速自检一下,问问自己在这 10 分钟里你们在哪里。你们甚至到了这里吗?有些人还没到。身体上你们在这里,但属灵地、心理上,也许你们还在家里,也许还在工作上。也许你们在想之前的一场对话,也许你们身体和灵魂都到了,但现在你在想,我希望他快点结束,因为我今天下午还没喝咖啡,或者我得去做晚饭。你们去了巴黎,我不知道。我们很少在场。我们不在场。

So if you think about it, all of the activity of the mind, it’s always moving, it’s always in motion, it’s always filled with thoughts and memories and images and anxieties and fears and resentments, and think of all of that turmoil that goes on inside of us, and either we’re mulling over things that happened yesterday, what they said in the office yesterday, or what my kumbaro said the other day, or what’s going to happen. All of these things are going to happen. Either we’re mulling about things in the past, going all the way back to my childhood, what did my parents do, or my grandparents, or where I was born, or what opportunity… It never ends. It’s like a cassette tape or a videotape that just plays over and over and over and over and over in our minds. So either we’re mulling over things that happened yesterday, or we’re anxious about tomorrow. What’s going to happen? What’s going to happen? What’s going to happen with this and that and the other thing?

所以如果你想想,心灵的所有活动,它总是在移动,总是在运动,总是充满了念头、记忆、图像、焦虑、恐惧和怨恨,想想我们内部发生的所有那种动荡,要么我们在反复思考昨天发生的事情,昨天他们在办公室说了什么,或者我的教亲那天说了什么,或者将要发生什么。所有这些事情都将发生。要么我们在反复思考过去的事情,一直回到我的童年,我的父母做了什么,或者我的祖父母,或者我出生在哪里,或者什么机会……它永无止境。就像一盒录音带或录像带,在我们的心灵中一遍又一遍地播放。所以要么我们在反复思考昨天发生的事情,要么我们对明天感到焦虑。会发生什么?会发生什么?这将如何发生,那将如何发生,还有其他事情?

So if you think about it, we’re sort of torn in two directions. Either we’re worried about the past, or resentful about the past, or daydreaming about the past, people that we knew, places that we went. Or we’re focused on some sort of imaginary future. What if this? What if that? How about this? How about that? And it turns out that we are almost never in the present. We are absent from the present. And we know what that’s like. You know what it’s like when you have a problem and you want to talk to someone, even a friend, and they’re not there. They’re not present. They’re not listening to you because they’re distracted by things. You know what it’s like. And we do that to them too. They’re telling you their problem. I tell you the good news of the heart, and you think about… what will you eat on Easter? That’s not the case. We are not present, neither in ourselves, nor in others. Where are we? That is the question.

所以如果你想想,我们某种程度上被撕裂成两个方向。要么我们担心过去,或对过去感到怨恨,或对过去做白日梦,我们认识的人,我们去过的地方。要么我们专注于某种想象的未来。如果这样怎么办?如果那样怎么办?这个怎么样?那个怎么样?结果证明我们几乎从不在当下。我们缺席于当下。我们知道那是什么感觉。当你有问题想和人谈谈,即使是朋友,而他们不在那里时,你知道那是什么感觉。他们不在场。他们没有听你说话,因为他们被事情分心了。你知道那是什么感觉。我们也对他们那样做。他们在告诉你他们的问题。我告诉你们心中的福音,而你在想……复活节你会吃什么?情况并非如此。我们不在场,既不在我们自己里面,也不在别人里面。我们在哪里?这就是问题所在。

But to be absent from the present—where is God? In neither our thoughts about the past nor in the fantasy future we imagine is God present. And if we are not present in the present, we are not with God. So if I’m living in my past, if I’m pining over my lost youth and how handsome I used to be and how I used to be able to run 10 miles and the friends that I had and the places that I went and how, or if I’m worried about the future, where am I, I don’t have enough money to retire, or where am I going to live and what happens if there’s an economic recession. If I’m living in the past or the future, I’m not living in the present. And God exists only in the present. God does not exist in my memories of the past, and God does not exist in my daydreams and my fantasies about the future. So if all I’m doing is mulling over the past and imagining things about the future, I’m not in the present, and that means I’m not with God. I’m not with God. God is not the God of my imagination, of my thoughts, of my memories, of my resentments. O theos zis tu paron. As I said before, if we’re absent from the present, we’re absent from God.

但缺席于当下——上帝在哪里?在我们关于过去的念头中,也不在我们想象的幻想未来中,上帝都不在场。如果我们不在当下在场,我们就不与上帝同在。所以如果我活在过去,如果我怀念我逝去的青春,怀念我过去多么英俊,过去能跑 10 英里,以及我有的朋友和去过的地方,或者如果我担心未来,我在哪里,我没有足够的钱退休,或者我要住在哪里,如果发生经济衰退怎么办。如果我活在过去或未来,我就不是活在当下。而上帝只存在于当下。上帝不存在于我对过去的记忆中,上帝也不存在于我对未来的白日梦和幻想中。所以如果我所有做的只是反复思考过去并想象关于未来的事情,我就不在当下,这意味着我不与上帝同在。我不与上帝同在。上帝不是我想象、念头、记忆、怨恨的上帝。上帝活在当下。正如我之前所说,如果我们缺席于当下,我们就缺席于上帝。

Think about it. Even when we’re sleeping, our minds are active. This is killing our anthropos. And from where comes this movement, this commotion, this action? It doesn’t correspond with anything. I think most of us are so distracted most of the time that we don’t really have a sense of what’s going on inside of us. From the minute we wake up in the morning, most of us now, from what I understand, the first thing people do is reach for their iPhone. They say the last thing you touch at night and the first thing you touch in the morning is your iPhone. It’s like that creature in the Lord of the Rings, Gollum, with the ring. It’s like, “My precious, my precious.” He couldn’t be apart from the iPhone. Which means all of our waking time, all of our waking time is spent hooked up to some sort of gadget or device or you’re emailing or you’re texting or you’re tweeting or you’re on the computer or you’re binge watching or you’re on the phone.

想想看。即使当我们睡觉时,我们的心灵也是活跃的。这是在扼杀我们的人性。这种运动、这种骚动、这种行动来自哪里?它不与任何事物对应。我想我们大多数人大多数时候都如此分心,以至于我们真的没有意识到我们内部发生了什么。从早上醒来的那一刻起,我们大多数人,据我所知,做的第一件事就是伸手去拿 iPhone。有人说你晚上摸的最后一件事和早上摸的第一件事就是你的 iPhone。就像《指环王》里的那个生物,咕噜,拿着戒指。就像,“我的宝贝,我的宝贝。”他不能离开 iPhone。这意味着我们所有的清醒时间,我们所有的清醒时间都花在连接某种小器具或设备上,或者你在发邮件,或者你在发短信,或者你在发推特,或者你在电脑上,或者你在刷剧,或者你在打电话。

We’re constantly distracted; we’re constantly living outside of ourselves. Because as I said, we seem to be afraid to actually be alone. We seem to be afraid to not have these things on. Actually, a long time ago, Sigmund Freud, the famous psychologist, noticed—because in those days they had radio—he noticed that the moment that people walked into a room, they put the radio on. That was the first thing they did. They walked into the room, they put the radio on. I see this today. People get home from work, the first thing they do, put the TV on. Or the radio or something else. What did Freud say about that? He said, why do they do that? Or you go to the car, the first thing. God forbid there’s a two-minute period where there isn’t some distraction. Freud’s answer to that was because these people don’t want to hear or confront their subconscious thoughts or impulses. I wouldn’t put it exactly like that, but I think that’s generally right. If we can’t be alone with ourselves, that means we have a problem with ourselves. Either we don’t like ourselves. Why should we be uncomfortable being alone, going for a solitary walk, without the music and the gadgets and the… why? What are we afraid of? What are we afraid of? So I think we’re so distracted that we don’t even realize what’s going on inside of ourselves. And I think it’s only now, maybe when you’re waiting online somewhere in the bank or something like that, or people don’t even do that anymore. Say you’re trying to go to sleep at night and you’re dozing off and you’ve turned off the iPhone and the TV is off and you’re there by yourself now. And now you start: “Oh, what’s all of this? What are all these thoughts in my mind?” Now you see them. They’re not just there at 10:30 or 11 o’clock at night when you’re going to sleep. That’s going on all the time. And I think we’re running away from that, and we’re distracting ourselves with all of the gadgets and the music and the noise and the binge-watching and the constant checking of the email and the tweets and the text messages. But there are moments when you hear all of that internal noise. And some of us can’t sleep at night because of that. All of those thoughts, all of that anxiety, all of that turmoil, all of that… And it’s not an exaggeration. It can be torture. It can be torture. Whoever has had a sleepless night knows just how awful that is. To not be able to sleep because your mind is racing because of… Sometimes the concerns are real. Sometimes, “I lost my job today.” They put on a kimiko. But more often than not, the concerns are either imaginary or they’re magnified by our mind. And we know the power that these thoughts have. I can think of someone that I don’t like. There might be someone that I have a problem with, a family member or a colleague or a neighbor or someone like this. And we know there’s an issue there. And if that person comes to my mind, all of a sudden that person’s face, let’s say, or just the memory of them comes to my mind, I know that my blood pressure can start to rise. I can become physically upset just by the thought of someone. And if I allow myself to—if I indulge in that thought—I can become, I can actually become angry. I start remembering the negative things I think they did to me: “They said this to me, and they did that to me.” And you know that gets me mad. Now I think of the power of thought that can even strike a person as a crime, from a single thought, from a single word. Consider where our mind is here, our mind is there. Look, if you’re sitting here and your mind is somewhere else, that’s fragmentation. That’s a low-level form of psychological dissociation. You’re having a low-level out-of-body experience. You’re here sitting in the church, but your nous is right in the potemazisu, actually. Tonight and tomorrow we’re celebrating St. John of Climacus, St. John of the Ladder, who’s a church father and abbot of the Monastery of Saint Catherine’s at Sinai, who wrote a book called The Ladder of Divine Ascent. That’s why they call him Saint John of the Ladder. And he’s somewhere in The Ladder. He says, “If you could stay inside your body for one day, you can be saved.” If you can sit and keep your soul inside your body for one day. You might even say, μια ώρα, θα σωθείς. But are soul and body united for 24 hours? That is hard to… Look, you can’t even say one single Jesus prayer without being distracted. Ούτε ένα. Ούτε ένα. Κύριε Ιησού Χριστέ, ελέησόν με. Δεν μπορείς να πεις χωρίς διασπασμό, χωρίς περισπασμό. Πώς θα γίνουν 24 ώρες μετά; When for a second, a person cannot concentrate and stay inside himself, his soul flies and goes wherever he wants. When we do see some of these things inside of us, it can be very disorienting, it can be very confusing, and it can be very frightening. To get a glimpse, in other words, of your inner darkness, because everyone has some darkness in them. And we pretend it’s not there, or we think it’s going to go away, or other people see it, we don’t see it. But it’s there. And when you see it… it can be very upsetting, it can be very disturbing. For example, if you’re sitting in church on Sunday and a negative thought enters into your mind, you experience a blasphemy in your mind, inside the church. You didn’t want it, you didn’t ask for it. You don’t like it at all, but this evil thought comes to you. A blasphemy. Where does this come from? So you think, “Who am I to think like this? Where does this come from?” So.

我们不断分心;我们不断活在我们自己之外。因为正如我所说,我们似乎害怕真正独处。我们似乎害怕不打开这些东西。实际上,很久以前,著名的心理学家西格蒙德·弗洛伊德注意到——因为那时候他们有收音机——他注意到人们走进房间的那一刻,就会打开收音机。那是他们做的第一件事。他们走进房间,打开收音机。我今天也看到了这种情况。人们下班回家,做的第一件事,打开电视。或者收音机或其他什么东西。弗洛伊德对此怎么说?他说,他们为什么这样做?或者你走到车旁,做的第一件事。上帝禁止有两分钟的时间没有任何分心。弗洛伊德对此的回答是,因为这些人不想听到或面对他们的潜意识念头或冲动。我不会完全那样说,但我认为大体上是正确的。如果我们不能与自己独处,那意味着我们与自己有问题。要么是我们不喜欢自己。为什么我们会不舒服地独处,独自散步,没有音乐、没有小工具、没有……为什么?我们害怕什么?我们害怕什么?所以我认为我们如此分心,以至于我们甚至没有意识到自己内部正在发生什么。我认为只有现在,也许当你在银行某处排队等候或类似的时候,或者人们甚至不再那样做了。假设你晚上试图入睡,你正在打盹,你关掉了苹果手机,电视也关了,你现在独自一人。然后你开始:“哦,这都是什么?我脑海里这些都是什么念头?”现在你看到了它们。它们不仅仅是在晚上 10:30 或 11 点你要睡觉时才在那里。那是一直在发生的。我认为我们在逃避那个,我们用所有的小工具、音乐、噪音、 binge-watching(刷剧)、不断检查电子邮件、推特和短信来分心。但有些时候你会听到所有那些内在的噪音。我们中有些人晚上因此无法入睡。所有那些念头,所有那些焦虑,所有那些动荡,所有那些……这并不夸张。那可能是折磨。那可能是折磨。任何有过不眠之夜的人都知道那有多糟糕。因为你的心灵在飞奔而无法入睡,因为……有时担忧是真实的。有时,“我今天丢了工作。”他们穿上了一件奇米科。但更多时候,担忧要么是想象的,要么是被我们的心灵放大的。我们知道这些念头有多大的力量。我可以想到一个我不喜欢的人。可能我有问题的人,家庭成员、同事、邻居或类似的人。我们知道那里有问题。如果那个人来到我的脑海里,突然那个人的脸,比如说,或者只是对他们的记忆来到我的脑海里,我知道我的血压开始升高。仅仅因为想到某人,我就能变得身体不安。如果我允许自己——如果我沉溺于那个念头——我能变得,我实际上能变得愤怒。我开始想起我认为他们对我做的负面事情:“他们对我说了这个,他们对我做了那个。”你知道那让我生气。现在我想到了念头的力量,甚至可以从一个念头、一句话将一个人打击为罪行。看看我们的心灵在这里,我们的心灵在那里。看,如果你坐在这里,而你的心灵在别处,那就是分裂。那是低级别的解离。你正在经历低级别的出体体验。你坐在这里在教会里,但你的心灵就在波特马齐苏,实际上。今晚和明天我们要庆祝圣约翰·克里马克斯,梯阶之神圣约翰,他是一位教父,也是西奈山圣凯瑟琳修院的院长,他写了一本书叫《神圣攀登的天梯》。这就是为什么他们称他为梯阶之神圣约翰。他在《天梯》中的某处说,“如果你能在一天内待在你的身体里,你就能得救。”如果你能坐着,将你的灵魂保持在你的身体里一天。你甚至可以说,μια ώρα, θα σωθείς(一个小时,你就能得救)。但是灵魂和身体联合 24 小时吗?那很难……看,你甚至不能说一个单一的耶稣祷文而不分心。Ούτε ένα. Ούτε ένα.(一个也没有。一个也没有。)Κύριε Ιησού Χριστέ, ελέησόν με.(主耶稣基督,请怜悯我。)你不能 without 分心地说,without 分神。之后怎么会有 24 小时呢?当一个人哪怕一秒钟都不能集中并待在自己里面时,他的灵魂就会飞走,去他想去的地方。当我们确实看到我们内部的一些这些事情时,它可能非常迷失方向,非常困惑,也非常可怕。换句话说,瞥见你的内在黑暗,因为每个人里面都有一些黑暗。我们假装它不在那里,或者我们认为它会消失,或者别人看到它,我们没看到。但它在那里。当你看到它……它可能非常令人心烦,非常令人不安。例如,如果你周日坐在教会里,一个消极念头进入你的脑海,你在教会里,在脑海里经历亵渎。你不想要它,你没请求它。你一点也不喜欢它,但这个邪念来到你这里。一个亵渎。这从哪里来?所以你想,“我是谁才能这样想?这从哪里来?”所以。

Like I said, the blasphemous thought that comes, or the angry thought, or the violent thought, or the dark kind of sexual thought, or all of these things that pass through our minds. A person can see those things and become very confused, become very frightened by them, and they might think they’re having some sort of a problem. Which is why we need to know what is going on inside of ourselves. We need to know that. We need to know where all of this comes from. What is the cause of all of this inner turmoil? What does it all mean and how are we supposed to respond to it? What does one do? Having seen some of these things in myself now, seeing my own faults, my own arguments, my passions, my sins, my insecurities, and all that we have in common, Thank you. How should I answer now? What is the right way to deal with this situation? This is the mystery. And this is the mystery of life. Because if a person cannot fight properly with this situation, he cannot move forward. Why? Because if we don’t know how to face ourselves, in a sense, and the situation that we have, we can never make progress in the spiritual life. Why? Because these are the things that hold us back. Because if every time I think of you or you or you, I get angry, or if I remember what you did to me or what you said to me last year at Christmas or when you didn’t come to my house when I had Thanksgiving dinner or whatever it was, if every time those thoughts enter my mind, I become angry and upset, that means those are the places where I’m not free. Those are the places where I’m not free. It’s like you have a little dog and you have it on a rope and it’s tied to the tree, and the dog, it can kind of run around a little bit, but I can think that I’m fine, but then all of a sudden, don’t bring up this subject or don’t talk about that one, because I get to the end of my rope. And those are the places where I’m not free. I’m not free and I have no joy because of this. It ruins everything. It ruins me. It ruins my relationships with others. So I have to know what’s going on. So let’s maybe just spend a couple of minutes and enter a little more deeply into some of the psychological and spiritual dynamics that are operative here.

就像我说的,那些袭来的亵渎念头,或是愤怒的念头,或是暴力的念头,或是那种阴暗的性念头,或是所有这些穿过我们心灵的事情。一个人看到这些事可能会变得非常困惑,非常害怕,他们可能会认为自己出了某种问题。这就是为什么我们需要知道我们内心正在发生什么。我们需要知道这一点。我们需要知道这一切从何而来。所有这些内心动荡的原因是什么?这一切意味着什么,我们又该如何回应?一个人该怎么做?既然现在我看到了自己身上的一些这样的事情,看到我自己的过错、我自己的争辩、我的情欲、我的罪、我的不安全感,以及我们共有的一切,谢谢。我现在该如何回答?处理这种情况的正确方法是什么?这是一个奥迹。这也是生命的奥迹。因为如果一个人不能正确地与这种情况争战,他就无法前进。为什么?因为如果我们不知道如何在某种意义上面对我们自己,以及我们所处的处境,我们就永远无法在属灵生活中取得进步。为什么?因为这些都是阻碍我们的事情。因为如果每次我想到你或你或你,我都会生气,或者如果我记得去年圣诞节你对我做的事或对我说的话,或者当我举行感恩节晚餐时你没来我家,或者不管是什么事,如果每次这些念头进入我的心灵,我都变得生气和烦恼,那就意味着那些是我不自由的地方。那些是我不自由的地方。这就像你有一只小狗,你用绳子拴着它,把它系在树上,狗可以稍微跑动一下,我可能觉得自己没事,但突然间,别提这个话题或别谈那个话题,因为我到了绳子的尽头。那些是我不自由的地方。我不自由,因此我没有喜乐。它毁了一切。它毁了我。它毁了我与他人的关系。所以我必须知道正在发生什么。所以让我们也许花几分钟,更深入地进入一些在此运作的心理和属灵动态。

Now the first thing to say is that human beings are very complex creatures. They say the most complicated thing in the universe by far, it’s not anything in the solar system or in the galaxy, it’s the human brain. Just on a strictly physiological level, on a strictly neurological level, the human brain is the most complex and complicated thing that human beings know, and we know very little about it. We’re still learning about it. And the funny thing is that when we try, when neurologists and psychologists and others try to learn about the brain, it’s the brain trying to figure the brain out. Because it’s the brain of the psychologist or the brain of the neurologist trying to figure out essentially his own brain. So you wonder, can that even be done? It’s a little bit too self-referential to reach a conclusion. But the truth of it is that our experience of the world is extremely complex; we experience the world in complex ways. We’re not like little earthworms that see light and dark and heat and cold and react to them. Our response to the world, the way we look at the world, the way we perceive the world, the way we take in the world is extremely complex. And it’s not simply on the level of the senses, like a camera takes a picture of something because it takes in the external source of light and it records the image. The eye works like that, but the camera doesn’t have a mind, the camera doesn’t have feelings, the camera doesn’t have a memory. So we have all the optical machinery in a way, but we bring this whole emotional and cognitive and spiritual world to that act of perception. So we take things in from the world around us and we form ideas about them. I’ve been up here now for 20 minutes and many of you will have formed ideas about me by seeing me, by hearing me. This is the way the mind works. We make judgments, we make decisions, we size people up, we measure things up. Now all of that could be wrong because how can you say you know me? Maybe you’re seeing me now for the first time, but we do that.

现在要说的第一件事是,人类是非常复杂的受造物。人们说,迄今为止宇宙中最复杂的东西,不是太阳系或银河系中的任何东西,而是人脑。仅在严格的生理层面上,在严格的神经学层面上,人脑是人类所知最复杂、最 complicated 的东西,而我们对它知之甚少。我们仍在学习关于它的知识。有趣的事情是,当我们尝试时,当神经学家和心理学家等人试图了解大脑时,这是大脑在试图弄清楚大脑。因为这是心理学家的大脑或神经学家的大脑试图本质上弄清楚他自己的大脑。所以你会想,这能做到吗?这有点太自我指涉了,难以得出结论。但事实是,我们对世界的体验极其复杂;我们以复杂的方式体验世界。我们不像小蚯蚓那样只看到光与暗、热与冷并对此作出反应。我们对世界的回应,我们看待世界的方式,我们感知世界的方式,我们接纳世界的方式是极其复杂的。这不仅仅是在感官层面上,就像相机给某物拍照,因为它接收外部光源并记录图像。眼睛是这样工作的,但相机没有心灵,相机没有感觉,相机没有记忆。所以我们在某种意义上拥有所有的光学机器,但我们将整个情感、认知和属灵的世界带到了那个感知行为中。所以我们从周围的世界接收事物,并形成关于它们的想法。我在这里已经 20 分钟了,你们中的许多人通过看到我、听到我,已经形成了关于我的想法。这就是心灵运作的方式。我们做出判断,我们做出决定,我们打量人,我们衡量事物。现在所有这些都可能出错,因为你怎么能说你了不起我?也许你现在是第一次见我,但我们确实那样做。

The fathers of the Church, the saints of the Church, make a basic distinction, which I think is helpful, between pragmata and noimata. Pragmata, the Greek word pragma, plural pragmata, in modern Greek we use it to mean things, but it also means realities or objects. So there are things in the world. There are trees, there are houses, there are people, there are automobiles, there are pragmata in the world, but there are also what the church fathers called noimata. From noima. To noima ta noimata, and the word nous, you can hear that word in there as well. So noimata are sort of the mental representations of the pragmata. The noimata are sort of the mental images that we form about things in the world. So a simple example. Let’s say I’m a little child. I don’t know a whole lot about the world because I was only born a short while ago. I’m still learning. And I go into the kitchen, I’m just learning how to walk, I go into the kitchen, there’s an oven there, I have no idea what an oven is, I’ve never seen an oven before, and I go up and I put my hands on it, and the oven is on and it’s hot and I burn my hands. I thought, “Oh, goodness, that’s an intense experience to have, put your hands on the outside of the oven.” A few days later, I’m back in the kitchen, and maybe I’m not a very bright boy, and I do the same thing again. They say it’s the old proverb, once burnt, a lesson learned. Sometimes you need to be burnt multiple times to learn our lessons.

教父、教会圣人做了一个基本的区分,我认为这很有帮助,即在‘客观事物’(pragmata)和‘心相’(noimata)之间。Pragmata,希腊词 pragma,复数 pragmata,在现代希腊语中我们用它指事物,但它也意味着现实或对象。所以世界中有事物。有树,有房子,有人,有汽车,世界中有‘客观事物’(pragmata),但也有教父所称的‘心相’(noimata)。来自 noima。To noima ta noimata,还有 nous(心灵)这个词,你也能在那里听到这个词。所以‘心相’(noimata)某种上是‘客观事物’(pragmata)的心相。‘心相’(noimata)某种上是我们关于世界事物形成的心相。所以举个简单的例子。假设我是个小孩。我对世界了解不多,因为我才出生不久。我还在学习。我走进厨房,我刚学走路,我走进厨房,那里有个烤箱,我不知道烤箱是什么,我以前从未见过烤箱,我走上前把手放在上面,烤箱开着,很热,我烫伤了手。我想,“哦,天哪,把手放在烤箱外面是个强烈的体验。”几天后,我回到厨房,也许我不是个聪明的男孩,我又做了同样的事。人们说那是老谚语,吃一堑长一智。有时你需要被烫多次才能吸取教训。

But sooner or later, if that happens once or twice or three times, I will form, from the pragma—which is the pragma here is the hot oven—I will form the noima, the sort of general abstract idea in my mind now that ovens have a high possibility of being hot and I better exercise caution around them. You see now, not all ovens are hot, not all ovens even work, but now I have this idea that ovens are hot and I have to be careful around them. You see what happens? We have simple experiences of physical sensations in the world, but we end up forming these ideas about them. We end up forming these noema, ta noema ta tom pragmaton. And there’s a distinction between the two of them. This is a very simple idea because it involves heat and sensation and so on. But most of the ideas that we require are much more complex. Why? Because they’re tied not to just the sensation of heat or cold, but they’re tied to our feelings and our emotions and our whole selves and our personality.

但迟早,如果这种情况发生一次、两次或三次,我就会从那个客观事物(这里的客观事物就是热烤箱)形成心相,也就是我现在心中形成的一种普遍抽象观念,即烤箱很有可能很烫,我最好在它们周围小心谨慎。你看,并不是所有的烤箱都是热的,甚至不是所有的烤箱都能用,但现在我有了这个观念,认为烤箱是热的,我必须小心对待。你明白发生什么了吗?我们在世界上有简单的身体感官体验,但最终我们形成了关于它们的这些观念。我们最终形成了这些心相,ta noema ta tom pragmaton(事物的心相)。这两者之间是有区别的。这是一个非常简单的观念,因为它涉及热量和感觉等等。但我们所需要的大多数观念要复杂得多。为什么?因为它们不仅与冷热的感觉相连,还与我们的感受、情绪、整个自我以及个性相连。

I’ll give you another example that the Church Fathers use. They say gold; by gold they mean wealth, money, right? Gold, they say. It’s gold. It’s a stone. It’s something that comes from the earth, from the ground. Gold is just gold; it’s a mineral. Gold is nothing more than a mineral. There’s nothing bad about it. There’s nothing evil about it. It’s just something that comes out of the ground. So the pragma, the thing, is the gold. But I could come to realize that if I have a lot of gold, I have maybe a little more power to buy things, let’s say, and to make myself look superior to other people, or to buy a bigger home, or to take trips that I can tell my friends about and have them see just how much money I have. Think of the authority and the social status and the prestige and the power that the gold can…

我再举一个教父们使用的例子。他们说金子;说到金子,他们指的是财富、金钱,对吧?他们说,这是金子。它是石头。它是来自大地、来自土壤的东西。金子就是金子;它是一种矿物。金子不过是矿物罢了。它没有什么不好的。它没有什么邪恶的。它只是从地里出来的东西。所以,那个客观事物,那个东西,就是金子。但我可能会意识到,如果我有很多金子,我也许就有更多的权力去买东西,比如说,让自己看起来比别人优越,或者买更大的房子,或者去旅行,然后告诉我的朋友,让他们看看我有多少钱。想想金子能带来的权威、社会地位、声望和权力……

So in my mind now… When I see gold, I don’t see a mineral. I don’t see a mineral anymore. I see power, the ability to impress other people, and all of the things that I think. You see the difference? Another example that the Church Fathers use, that the Saints use, is a beautiful face. The face of a beautiful woman, or the face of a beautiful… That’s just a face. That’s just a human face. There’s nothing inherently wrong or sinful about human beauty, but yet I can in my mind develop an image now, right? I can have the knowing mind, right? I can become impassioned; I can become attached to particular kinds of faces, so that when I see this woman’s face that I think is a beautiful face, I’m attracted to her, I open the door for her, I buy dinner for her, I’m talking to her, but there’s another woman who does not conform to the image of beauty that I have in my mind and I ignore her.

所以现在在我的心灵中……当我看到金子时,我看到的不是矿物。我不再看它是矿物了。我看到的是权力,是给人留下深刻印象的能力,以及所有我想到的东西。你看出区别了吗?教父们、圣人们使用的另一个例子是一张美丽的脸。一个美丽女人的脸,或者一个美丽的……的脸。那只是一张脸。那只是一张人脸。人类的美本身没有什么错或罪,但我可以在心中发展出一个形象,对吧?我可以拥有认知的心智,对吧?我会产生情欲;我会依恋特定类型的脸,以至于当我看到这张我认为美丽的女人的脸时,我被她吸引,我为她开门,我为她买晚餐,我和她交谈,但还有另一个女人不符合我心中的美的形象,我就忽视她。

Now it could be that the woman who I don’t consider to be beautiful might actually be the better person. She might be the better wife, the better mother. But I don’t pay attention; I totally avoid her because she does not correspond to the noema, to the mental image that I have in my mind. And I’m attracted instead to the other person who I think is beautiful or who society tells me is beautiful, and that’s the one I end up with. It turns out that I’m so blinded by my own ideas that I can’t see that she’ll be a terrible wife and a terrible mother and she won’t be faithful to me or whatever. But we don’t see these things because our experience of reality is now interpreted by the ideas we have in our mind. Wives have images of their husbands in their mind, and husbands have images of their wives in their minds, and parents have images of their children in their mind, and so on.

现在,那个我不认为美丽的女人实际上可能是更好的人。她可能是更好的妻子,更好的母亲。但我不注意;我完全回避她,因为她不符合我心相,不符合我心中的心相。相反,我被我认为美丽或社会告诉我美丽的那个人所吸引,而那就是我最终选择的人。结果我发现,我被自己的观念蒙蔽了,以至于我看不到她会成为一个糟糕的妻子和糟糕的母亲,或者她不会对我不忠等等。但我们看不到这些东西,因为我们对现实的体验现在是由我们心中的观念来解读的。妻子心中有关于丈夫的形象,丈夫心中有关于妻子的形象,父母心中有关于孩子的形象,等等。

Let me ask you something. If I’m relating to you—let’s say there’s a husband and a wife, or a wife and a husband—and let’s say the wife is relating to her husband through that idea, she wants him to be a certain way: “Don’t do this, do that, this is how you should be, that’s not how you should be, that’s not what good husbands do,” etc. So if the wife is relating to the husband through the idea, right? And if the wife is doing that, or if the husband is doing that, can the wife or the husband really be said? What is the wife or the husband relating to? They’re relating to the idea. So in a sense, there is no relation here. There is no relation here. If I’m relating to the people around me through the ideas that I have of them, right? I don’t know. I don’t know. Oh, don’t tell me about her. I know all about her. Let me tell you what she did to me 25 years ago. Five minutes 25 years ago and, you know, that’s who she is. And if I only relate to people through these images that I have in my mind, am I really relating to people? Am I free, first of all? Am I even free? I’m not free. I’m bound. I’m enslaved to these images that I have in my mind that interpret my experiences for me.

让我问你一件事。如果我在与你相处——比如说有一对夫妻,或妻子和丈夫——假设妻子是通过那个观念与丈夫相处,她希望他是某种样子:“别做这个,做那个,你应该这样,你不应该那样,那不是好丈夫做的,”等等。所以如果妻子是通过观念与丈夫相处,对吧?如果妻子这样做,或者丈夫这样做,真的能说妻子或丈夫在相处吗?妻子或丈夫是在与什么相处?他们是在与观念相处。所以在某种意义上,这里没有关系。这里没有关系。如果我是通过我对周围人的观念与他们相处,对吧?我不知道。我不知道。哦,别跟我提她。我全知道她。让我告诉你 25 年前她对我做了什么。25 年前的五分钟,你知道,那就是她是谁。如果我只通过我心中的这些心相与人相处,我真的是在与人相处吗?首先,我自由吗?我甚至自由吗?我不自由。我被束缚了。我被奴役于这些心中的心相,它们为我解读我的体验。

And we know we have images of ourselves, too. We relate to our own selves through similar images. For example, I could say, okay, myself. You know, I have a PhD, I’ve read a million books, I’m very smart, and I expect you to treat me a certain way, right? I have a beard, I wear a robe, I expect to be treated with a certain level of respect when I come to your parish, and you have to put the carpet down on the floor for me because you have to, right? All right. So I—because why? Because I have this image of myself, and I think the whole world has to correspond to it. Now, what happens? You come along now. You say, “Father, okay, this is a small speech, we won’t put the carpet out for it. You have to do it.” I come to your church and say, “Father, we usually put the carpet out when the speakers come, but we’re not going to put it out tonight for you. We just don’t have the time; we’re not going to do it.” So you’ve just come now, and you’ve wounded me. You hurt me, you insulted me, you offended me. Well, what did you actually hurt or insult? Me or the idea of me?

我们也知道我们对自己也有形象。我们通过类似的形象与自我相处。例如,我可以说,好吧,我自己。你知道,我有博士学位,我读了一百万本书,我很聪明,我期望你以某种方式对待我,对吧?我有胡子,我穿长袍,当我来到你的堂区时,我期望得到某种程度的尊重,你们必须为我铺地毯,因为你们必须这样做,对吧?好吧。所以我——因为为什么?因为我有这个自我形象,我认为整个世界都必须与之对应。现在,发生了什么?你现在来了。你说:“神父,好吧,这是一个小型演讲,我们不会为此铺地毯。你必须这样做。”我来到你的教会说:“神父,我们通常在演讲者来时铺地毯,但今晚我们不会为你铺。我们只是没有时间;我们不打算这样做。”所以你刚才来了,你伤害了我。你伤了我,你侮辱了我,你冒犯了我。那么,你实际上伤害或侮辱了什么?是我,还是我的观念?

Why should it matter to me if there’s a red carpet? I don’t know how we got onto the red carpet, but we are on the carpet. Why should it matter to me? Why should it matter to me if there’s a carpet here or not? Or why should it matter if someone didn’t open the door when I thought they should? Or if they put me in a four-star hotel and not a five-star? You see what I mean? It’s all because of this image that I have of myself, and so on with the images that I have of others. And the simple solution, of course, is to be done with the image. Get rid of it, don’t have the image, let it go. Why should it matter if somebody bumps into you or disrespects you? So what? Really? What happened? What happened? And the other person doesn’t feel pain? The other person doesn’t have his problem? We don’t know why the other person is talking like that. He has his own pain. People do things, they say things, they have their own problems, they have their own pain, they have their own difficulty. Most of the time they’re not out to hurt us; they’re trying to protect themselves. Those are sort of self-defensive things where the boss yelled at them and they can’t yell at the boss, so they yell at you. It’s all of this displaced anger. And if all of us are so hypersensitive because of the images that we have, our life becomes what it has become.

为什么这里有红地毯对我来说很重要?我不知道我们是怎么走上红地毯的,但我们确实在地毯上。为什么这对我来说很重要?为什么这里有没有地毯对我来说很重要?或者,为什么当有人没有在我认为他们应该开门的时候开门,这对我来说很重要?或者,如果他们把我安排在四星级酒店而不是五星级,为什么这很重要?你明白我的意思吗?这都是因为我对自己的这个形象,以及我对他人的形象等等。当然,简单的解决办法就是摆脱这个形象。去掉它,不要持有这个形象,放下它。如果有人撞到你或不尊重你,为什么这很重要?那又怎样?真的吗?发生了什么?发生了什么?难道对方没有感到痛苦吗?对方没有他们自己的问题吗?我们不知道为什么那个人那样说话。他有他自己的痛苦。人们做事情,他们说话,他们有他们自己的问题,他们有他们自己的痛苦,他们有他们自己的困难。大多数时候,他们并不是要伤害我们;他们是在试图保护自己。那些算是自我防御的事情,比如老板对他们大吼大叫,他们不能对老板大吼大叫,所以他们就对你大吼大叫。这都是转移的愤怒。如果我们所有人都因为这些我们拥有的形象而变得过度敏感,我们的生活就变成了现在的样子。

I read a study that was actually very disturbing. This has been replicated multiple times. Do you know that good-looking children, like in grammar schools, on average get better grades than the other kids? And it’s not because they’re smarter. It’s because they’re perceived to be better looking. And when the good-looking kid acts out and makes trouble, he’s very easily forgiven. “Oh, Johnny’s just having a bad day,” right? But if the not-so-good-looking kid acts out or makes trouble, he’s punished and scolded and sent home. Look at the way we judge people and relate to people and respond to people based on something as superficial and as insignificant as their physical appearance. And we do it all the time. We do it all the time. And it’s Hollywood, it’s the star culture, it’s everything together that combines and colludes to create this situation. There’s so many things that we can say, but we don’t have all night.

我读过一项研究,实际上非常令人不安。这项研究已经被多次重复。你知道长得好看的孩子,比如在小学里,平均成绩比其他孩子好吗?这并不是因为他们更聪明。而是因为他们被认为更好看。当好看的孩子行为不端或制造麻烦时,他很容易就被原谅了。“哦,约翰尼只是今天心情不好,”对吧?但如果长得不好看的孩子行为不端或制造麻烦,他就会受到惩罚、责骂并被送回家。看看我们是如何基于外表这种肤浅和微不足道的事情来评判人、与人相处和回应人的。而且我们一直都在这样做。我们一直都在这样做。这是好莱坞,这是明星文化,是一切结合在一起勾结造成这种情况的因素。我们可以说很多事情,但我们没有整个晚上的时间。

One last point that I wanted to add, because it is an important thing. Elder Porphyrius used to say—now Saint Porphyrius used to say—and I think last year you had the Yerondisan here from the monastery speak. He used to say that the devil will take a sensitive person and try to make that person hypersensitive. In other words, the devil will take a good quality that you have. The devil will take a good quality. It’s good to be sensitive, by the way. You don’t want to be unsensitive or insensitive. So the devil will try to take a good quality that you have and make it bad. So the devil will take a sensitive person and try to make that person hypersensitive. Hypersensitive is no good. Sensitive is nice. Sensitive is good. Hypersensitive? Nobody likes hypersensitive. So the devil actually tries to exploit our feelings and our emotions. I had more to say about that, but I want to jump ahead and talk about how we should respond to the situation that I’ve described.

我想补充的最后一点,因为这是一件重要的事情。波菲里奥斯长老过去常说——现在圣波菲里奥斯过去常说——我想去年你们这里有来自修院的耶隆迪桑在这里讲话。他过去常说,魔鬼会抓住一个敏感的人,试图让那个人变得过度敏感。换句话说,魔鬼会抓住你拥有的一个良好品质。魔鬼会抓住一个良好的品质。顺便说一句,敏感是好的。你不想要不敏感或麻木。所以魔鬼会试图抓住你拥有的一个良好品质,使它变坏。所以魔鬼会抓住一个敏感的人,试图让那个人变得过度敏感。过度敏感不好。敏感很好。敏感是好的。过度敏感?没人喜欢过度敏感。所以魔鬼实际上试图利用我们的感受和情绪。我本来还有更多关于这方面的话要说,但我想跳过前面,谈谈我们应该如何回应我所描述的这种情况。

One of the first mistakes we make is that—and I think this happens at a very young age, as children, certainly by the time we’re teenagers—we make the mistake of self-identifying with all of the negative thoughts that we have inside of ourselves. The anger, the resentment, the daydreaming, the fantasies, the lusts, all of these things that pass through our minds. At some point we begin to identify with them, and we say, “Oh, this is me. Yeah, I’m an angry person, or I’m this way, or I’m that way.” And we don’t know who we are, and we get confused by this flow of emotion and feeling and thoughts, and we lose ourselves in all of this. We lose ourselves in all of this. And look, we have to realize that not every negative thought that goes through our mind is us. The mind is always active.

我们犯的第一个错误之一是——我认为这发生在很小的时候,作为孩子, certainly 到我们十几岁的时候——我们犯了一个错误,即与我们内心所有的消极念头自我认同。愤怒、怨恨、白日梦、幻想、色欲,所有这些穿过我们心灵的事情。在某个时刻,我们开始与它们认同,我们说,“哦,这就是我。是的,我是一个愤怒的人,或者我是这样的,或者我是那样的。”我们不知道我们是谁,我们被这种情绪、感受和念头的流动所困惑,我们在所有这一切中迷失了自己。我们在所有这一切中迷失了自己。听着,我们必须意识到,穿过我们心灵的每一个消极念头并不都是我们。心灵总是活跃的。

And there’s an example of this. Years ago, I used to go to Greece. When you would fly into the country, I would notice that there were always clouds over this or that. There were no clouds in the sky anywhere, but there were clouds over some of the islands. And I thought, it’s summertime, there’s not a cloud in the sky, why should there be clouds over these islands? It was odd to me. Then when I went to Mount Athos, I noticed that on beautiful, clear summer days, there was almost always a cloud. Sometimes it was perfectly circular, like a saucer sitting right on top of Athos. So I thought, that’s exactly what happens with us, right? What I mean to say is not that you are all of the bad thoughts. That’s just bad. That’s a cloudy day. But you’re not the cloud. You’re the mountain. See the difference? Right? So we make the mistake of forgetting that we’re the mountain, and we end up living in the clouds, in the thoughts, and we don’t realize that these are just things that are there. That’s not who we are. They might be linked to us, they might be related to us in some way, of course, but they do not express our deeper identity. And from the minute I realized that very simple kind of meteorological situation, it was always very helpful because we do have rainy days in our minds and gloomy days and foggy days. But that’s not who we are. And even on a foggy day, the sun is still shining somewhere, isn’t it? Which is why the Christian…

这里有一个例子。多年前,我常常去希腊。当你飞入这个国家时,我会注意到这个或那个岛上空总有云。天空任何地方都没有云,但有些岛屿上空有云。我觉得,现在是夏天,天空中没有云,为什么这些岛屿上空会有云?这对我来说很奇怪。后来当我去阿索斯山时,我注意到在美丽晴朗的夏日,几乎总有一朵云。有时它完全是圆形的,像一个碟子坐在阿索斯山顶上。所以我想,这正是发生在我们身上的事情,对吧?我的意思不是说你就是所有坏念头。那只是坏。那是阴天。但你不是云。你是那座山。看到区别了吗?对吧?所以我们犯了一个错误,忘记了我们是那座山,最终生活在云里,生活在念头里,我们没有意识到这些只是存在那里的东西。那不是我们是谁。它们可能与我们相连,它们可能在某些方面与我们相关,当然,但它们并不表达我们更深的身份。从我意识到那种非常简单的气象情况的那一刻起,它就总是很有帮助,因为我们的心灵中确实有雨天、阴天和雾天。但那不是我们是谁。即使在雾天,太阳仍在某处照耀,不是吗?这就是为什么基督徒…

A person who believes in Jesus Christ should never be upset. Not too much anyway. Because we know that even when the clouds come in, the sun is still shining somewhere, even if we can’t see it. The first thing to do is to not identify yourself with your thoughts. The other thing to do is simply, we have to—it’s a good Christian practice, it’s a good spiritual practice—to make a new habit now. And stop engaging those negative thoughts. Stop engaging those negative thoughts. Don’t entertain them. Don’t couple with them. Don’t welcome them in. Don’t dialogue with them. We do this all the time. We’ve gotten into the habit of doing it that we find it almost impossible to stop. I’m telling you, it’s not impossible. We don’t have to do that.

相信耶稣基督的人绝不应该烦恼。反正不要太烦恼。因为我们知道,即使乌云密布,太阳仍在某处照耀,即使我们看不见。首先要做的是不要认同你的念头。另一件事很简单,我们必须——这是一种良好的基督徒操练,也是一种良好的属灵操练——现在养成一个新习惯。停止参与那些消极念头。停止参与那些消极念头。不要款待它们。不要与它们耦合。不要欢迎它们进来。不要与它们对话。我们一直都在这样做。我们已经养成了这样做的习惯,以至于发现几乎不可能停止。我告诉你们,这不是不可能的。我们不必那样做。

The other day, I’ll give you an example. It was early in the morning and I went somewhere to do something and a colleague, somebody that I work with, made a kind of passive-aggressive remark to me. It was sort of one of these rude things that people say, a kind of a dig, but it’s a veiled kind of a dig. And I thought about it. I said, “Gee, why are they saying that’s me? That’s not.” It was rude. It was offensive, but I didn’t have time to deal with it because I had to go to a meeting. Then I had to teach a class, then I had to go somewhere else, and the whole day went by. By the time I got home, it was 8 o’clock at night. And that thought waited for me all day. All day that thought waited for me. I got home. It was the end of the day, and all of a sudden, it was like I heard a voice, and the voice was saying, “Are you going to let him get away with that? Meta-po-or-des-di-la-vi.” And again, I’m like, “Oh yeah, that’s right, am I?” And then the voice, that voice, it says something like, “If you let them walk all over you, they’re going to think you’re weak and they’ll do it again.” And then I said, “Oh.” Makriya. I thought about it for a minute. I’m like, “I’m not going down that road.” You don’t have to engage those thoughts. I could have sat there and worked myself up into a fury that evening. And I’ll indulge in revenge. And I’ll get him and I’ll show him. And I’ll call people up. “What he said to me today?” On and on and on. I’ll drag other people.

前几天,我举个例子。那是个大清晨,我去某处做某事,一位同事,也就是和我一起工作的人,对我说了一些被动攻击性的话。那是人们说的那种粗鲁的话,一种挖苦,但是一种隐蔽的挖苦。我想了想。我说:“嘿,他们为什么说那是我?那不是。”这很粗鲁。很冒犯,但我没时间处理,因为我得去开会。然后我得去上课,然后得去别的地方,一整天过去了。等我到家时,已经是晚上 8 点了。那个念头等了我一整天。那个念头等了我一整天。我回到家。一天结束了,突然,好像听到一个声音,那声音说:“你打算就这样放过他吗?梅塔 - 波 - 奥 - 德 - 迪 - 拉 - 维。”我又想:“哦,对,是吗?”然后那个声音,那个声音说:“如果你让他们践踏你,他们会认为你很软弱,他们会再这样做。”然后我说:“哦。”马克里亚。我想了一会儿。我想:“我不会走那条路。”你不必参与那些念头。那天晚上我本可以坐在那里让自己勃然大怒。我会沉溺于报复。我会对付他,我会让他好看。我会打电话给别人。“今天他对我说了什么?”没完没了。我会拖累其他人。

One sentence and as logismos. And I’m here to tell you that it’s very hard, but you don’t need to engage them, you don’t need to couple with them, you don’t need to entertain them, you don’t need to invite them into your heart, you don’t need to think about it. Like in biblical terms, they’re unclean things. You don’t touch things that are unclean. If you saw something on the street that was disgusting or gross, you wouldn’t. But yet with these thoughts? A piano man, a messos. Saint Hezekias of Sinai, another saint from Sinai, we’re celebrating John of Sinai tonight. He has a wonderful image. He says the mind is like a lamb. It’s like a young, innocent, almost naive kind of creature. It doesn’t really understand a lot. And the lamb is in the meadow. And at one point, this horrible beast, like a wolf or a dog or some ravenous creature, appears on the periphery of the meadow where the lamb is. And the lamb sees the creature. But it doesn’t know what it is because it’s a lamb. It has no experience of these things. And he says not only does the lamb not know what this beast is, what the wolf is or the wild dog… He says the lamb thinks that it’s its mother. And what does it do? It runs toward it. The innocent, naive lamb runs towards this horrible, ghastly. And he says in the real world we know what happens when little lambs run in the direction of hungry wolves. We know how that story ends, but in the spiritual world the story’s not over there, and this is the only thing the mind can learn from that experience.

一句话就是一个妄念。我在这里告诉你们,这很难,但你不需要参与它们,不需要与它们耦合,不需要款待它们,不需要邀请它们进入你的心,不需要思考它。就像圣经术语所说,它们是不洁之物。你不会触摸不洁之物。如果你在街上看到令人厌恶或恶心的东西,你不会碰。但对于这些念头呢?一个“皮亚诺人”,一个“梅索斯”。西奈的圣赫斯科,另一位来自西奈的圣人,我们今晚庆祝西奈的圣约翰。他有一个美妙的意象。他说心灵就像一只羔羊。它就像一种年轻、无辜、几乎天真的受造物。它不太懂很多事情。羔羊在草地上。有时,这只可怕的野兽,像狼或狗或某种贪婪的受造物,出现在羔羊所在草地的边缘。羔羊看到了这个受造物。但它不知道那是什么,因为它是羔羊。它对这些事情没有经验。他说,不仅羔羊不知道这只野兽是什么,不知道狼或野狗是什么……他说羔羊认为那是它的母亲。它会怎么做?它跑向它。这只无辜、天真的羔羊跑向这可怕、恐怖的东西。他说在现实世界中,我们知道当小羔羊跑向饥饿的狼时会发生什么。我们知道故事如何结束,但在属灵世界中,故事在那里还没有结束,这是心灵从那经历中能学到的唯一事情。

In other words, a foul thought comes into your mind, an ugly thought comes into your mind, a dark thought comes into your mind, a blasphemous thought comes into your mind. The only thing he says you can learn by running toward that thought, by coupling with that thought, is just how foul and how awful that thought is. That’s the only thing you can learn from it. And if you think about it, you think about the ugly and the awful, but the thoughts that we have sometimes. Mark Twain once said, every man has secret thoughts that would shame the devil. There it is. No one wants to admit that, but he did. And it’s true of everyone. We have to now commit ourselves to the inner practice of not engaging these negative thoughts. We’ve done it for so long that it’s a hard habit to break. I’ve made myself an angry person, I’ve made myself overeat, I’ve made… whatever, because I’ve been giving in to the thoughts for so long. And the thoughts became actions and the actions became habits and I became habituated into ways of doing things, and now I can’t stop. Now all I need is the thoughts and the action follows immediately. Everything starts with thoughts, and that’s why the struggle is there on that level. We say the advice that we get in the monastery is: don’t think about your thoughts, and don’t think about not thinking about your thoughts, because if you’re trying to think about not thinking about them, you’re thinking about them. The idea is to simply think of it, think of the thoughts as sort of background noise, or they could be things on your peripheral vision. I have my hands here, I can see them in my peripheral vision, but I’m not looking at them.

换句话说,一个邪恶的念头进入你的心灵,一个丑陋的念头进入你的心灵,一个黑暗的念头进入你的心灵,一个亵渎的念头进入你的心灵。他说,你通过跑向那个念头,与那个念头耦合,唯一能学到的就是那个念头有多邪恶、多可怕。那是你唯一能从中学习到的。如果你思考它,你就是在思考丑陋和可怕,但有时我们拥有的念头……马克·吐温曾说过,每个人都有会让魔鬼感到羞愧的秘密念头。就是这样。没人愿意承认,但他承认了。这对每个人都是真的。我们现在必须致力于内在的操练,不参与这些消极念头。我们这样做太久了,以至于很难改掉这个习惯。我让自己成了一个愤怒的人,我让自己暴食,我让自己……不管怎样,因为我向念头妥协太久了。念头变成了行动,行动变成了习惯,我习惯了做事的方式,现在我停不下来。现在我只需要念头,行动就会立刻跟随。一切都始于念头,这就是为什么争战在那个层面。我们在修院得到的建议是:不要思考你的念头,也不要思考不去思考你的念头,因为如果你试图思考不去思考它们,你就是在思考它们。想法是简单地看待它,把念头看作某种背景噪音,或者它们可以是你们周边视野中的东西。我的手在这里,我可以在周边视野中看到它们,但我没有注视它们。

The thoughts are going to come and go. You can’t prevent that. Thoughts come and go, but you don’t have to shine the spotlight of your attention on them. We’re all sitting in church sometimes; what more can we do? You could be in line; this is a classic occasion. You are in the queue, you enter the queue to communicate, and an evil thought comes to you. At this moment, what will you do? Will you leave the queue? Will you not communicate? No. Will you sit there? Will you move forward? Will you say, “Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me, forgive me, look at who I am and what I have inside me”? Right? Wow. But with your strength, Christ, with your love, I will move forward. I am ready to communicate, I will communicate. Even if I have this thought. Because if the devil can throw you out of the temple, then… Right?

念头会来来去去。你无法阻止这一点。念头来来去去,但你不必将专注的聚光灯打在它们身上。我们有时都坐在教会里;我们还能做什么呢?你可能在排队;这是一个典型的情况。你在队列中,你进入队列要领圣体圣事,这时一个邪念涌上心头。这一刻,你会怎么做?你会离开队列吗?你不领圣体圣事了吗?不。你会坐在那里吗?你会向前走吗?你会说:“主耶稣基督,请怜悯我,赦免我,看看我是谁,看看我里面有什么”吗?对吧?哇。但靠着你的力量,基督,靠着你的爱,我会向前走。我准备好领圣体圣事了,我要领圣体圣事。即使我有这个念头。因为如果魔鬼能把你赶出圣殿,那么……对吧?

I gave an image of, in church often you could be in line to receive communion, and that’s when the devil tries to tempt you. You think about someone in front of you, or you watch someone else, or very, very ugly thoughts can come into your mind. Some people get out of the line at that point, if they can. That’s the wrong thing to do. You just say the thing to do is you grieve over yourself. You say, “God forgive me, look at me, look at the kind of man that I am, that these kinds of thoughts go through my mind. What kind of a person am I?” And you feel sorry, you say your cross, you say, “God forgive me,” but you don’t engage the thought. See, that’s the difference. St. Isaac the Syrian says that the dispassionate man is not the man who has no passions, it’s the man who doesn’t act on them. See the difference?

我打了个比方,在教会里,你常常可能排队领圣体圣事,而那就是魔鬼试图诱惑你的时候。你想着前面的人,或者你看着别人,或者非常、非常丑陋的念头会进入你的心灵。有些人在那一刻会退出队列,如果他们能的话。那是错误的做法。你要说的做法是,你为自己悲伤悔改。你说:“上帝赦免我,看看我,看看我是什么样的人,竟有这样的念头经过我的心灵。我是什么样的人?”你感到抱歉,你划十字架,你说:“上帝赦免我,”但你不参与那个念头。看,这就是区别。叙利亚的圣以撒说,无欲的人不是没有情欲的人,而是不按情欲行事的人。看到区别了吗?

The thought comes into my mind. Let’s say I’m shopping for a new watch. And the man in the watch store puts out five or six watches on the counter. And then he turns around to get something else, and maybe the thought comes to my mind. It doesn’t. This is not my particular problem. Maybe the thought comes to my mind and it says, “Take one of those watches.” I said, “I’m not going to do that.” So the thought can come. Let it come. But you don’t pay attention to it. You don’t act on it. You don’t act on it.

念头进入我的心灵。假设我在买一块新手表。手表店的人把五六块表放在柜台上。然后他转身去拿别的东西,也许念头进入我的心灵。并没有。这不是我特别的问题。也许念头进入我的心灵,它说:“拿走其中一块表。”我说:“我不会那样做。”所以念头可以来。让它来。但你不专注于它。你不按它行事。你不按它行事。

And maybe we can close with this because I think our time is coming toward the end. I think that if you live in your mind, if you live in this world of thoughts, you will be confused, you will be disoriented, and God will be nothing more than an abstract idea to you. If you are one of these people who rationalizes and intellectualizes and lives totally in your head, your thoughts are going to be like flies buzzing around your head, and God will never be a reality to you. God will just be a concept that you might have an opinion about, but no experience of. Because God doesn’t meet us, God doesn’t come to us on the level of our crazy thoughts, right? Which is why the church teaches us to descend from the mind into the heart. To live not from up here, but to live from the center of our being, from the core. Not from the mind, but from the heart. The heart is the center, not the mind, not the brain. The center of the person is the heart. That’s the core of us. That’s where we feel our guts. That’s where we feel things deeply. And if we live in our minds, as I said, we’ll never experience God, we’ll never know God, because God is not up there in all of that, the attic of the brain or the mind that’s full of all this clutter and junk. God is a reality that is deep within us, and deep within our center, and deep within our core. And when we get distracted and we find ourselves pulled out of ourselves into all of these thoughts, that’s where we need to recall our energies, recall our self, and enter that center place, enter the place of our heart. And there, not to just be idle, as they say, not to do nothing, but to say—when you get to that place—to say the Jesus Prayer.

也许我们可以以此结束,因为我想我们的时间快到了。我认为,如果你活在心灵里,如果你活在这个念头的世界里,你会困惑,你会迷失方向,上帝对你来说不过是一个抽象的概念。如果你是那种理性化、理智化、完全活在头脑里的人,你的念头就会像苍蝇一样在你头上嗡嗡叫,上帝对你永远不会成为现实。上帝只是一个你可能有意见但没有体验的概念。因为上帝不会在我们疯狂念头的层面上与我们相遇,上帝不会在那层面上来到我们这里,对吧?这就是为什么教会教导我们要从心灵下降到心。不是从这里活着,而是从我们存在的中心,从核心活着。不是从心灵,而是从心。心是中心,不是心灵,不是大脑。人的中心是心。那是我们的核心。那是我们感受直觉的地方。那是我们深刻感受事物的地方。如果我们活在心灵里,如我所说,我们永远不会体验上帝,永远不会认识上帝,因为上帝不在上面所有那些地方,不在充满杂乱和垃圾的大脑或心灵的阁楼里。上帝是深在我们里面的现实,深在我们中心,深在我们核心。当我们分心,发现自己被拉出自我进入所有这些念头时,那就是我们需要收回能量,收回自我,进入那个中心地方,进入我们心的地方。在那里,不只是无所事事,正如他们所说,不是什么都不做,而是说——当你到达那个地方时——诵念耶稣祷文。

In other words, if I’m troubled by thoughts, don’t think about the thoughts. Don’t let them overtake you like that. Saint Maximus the Confessor says, “Nobly endure the waves of thoughts that will come crashing over you.” That’s logizmi, the waves of logizmi. They come, they come, one after the other. He says, “Genios, sit there, don’t be afraid. Because you are the rock, you are the stone. And the thoughts will come, they will break, they will leave.” These are the moments. These are the moments. And to find that center, right, that deep part of yourself, and to know that that’s where you’re connected to God. Not in all of this madness that goes on in our mind, all the restlessness and the craving and the… We don’t have God there. The reality of God, the presence of God, is in us, in our hearts.

换句话说,如果我被念头困扰,不要想那些念头。不要让它们那样压倒你。认信者圣马克西姆说:“高尚地忍受那些将向你冲来的念头浪潮。”那就是妄念,妄念的浪潮。它们来了,来了,一个接一个。他说:“勇士,坐在那里,不要害怕。因为你是岩石,你是石头。念头会来,它们会破碎,它们会离开。”就是这些时刻。就是这些时刻。并找到那个中心,对吧,那个你深处的部分,并知道那就是你与上帝连接的地方。不在我们心灵中发生的所有这些疯狂中,不在所有的不安和渴望和……我们那里没有上帝。上帝的现实,上帝的同在,在我们里面,在我们的心里。

What’s the image they say? If you look at a tree, a tree has branches, a tree has a trunk and it has roots. And when the storm comes, when the winds come, where is the tree most agitated? Exoterica. It’s the outer branches of the tree. That’s the mind. All the thoughts. That’s what the person is being agitated by. So what do you do? If you’re in a storm, you’re not going to climb up to the top of the tree. You’re going to go somewhere by the trunk. So we should always do this, but especially when we feel agitated. That’s when we know that we’ve left our center, we’ve lost our center, we’ve left the place of the heart, and we have to go back to the core, to the center, to the trunk of the tree, to the roots of the tree, because that’s where the life comes from, and that’s where the strength is, and that’s where our safety is, in a sense. I had many more things to say, but we had a Vesper service, and I think I’ve spoken for quite some time now. Lethal naskurazu katolu. But I don’t know if there’s still time for… Do you want to do the questions and answers? So, no? Yes?

他们说的意象是什么?如果你看一棵树,树有树枝,树有树干,它有树根。当风暴来临时,当风吹来时,树哪里最动荡?外部。是树的外枝。那是心灵。所有的念头。那就是人被动荡的原因。那么你做什么?如果你在风暴中,你不会爬到树顶。你会去往树干附近。所以我们应该总是这样做,特别是当我们感到动荡时。那时我们就知道我们离开了中心,失去了中心,离开了心的地方,我们必须回到核心,回到中心,回到树干,回到树根,因为那是生命来源的地方,那是力量所在的地方,那是我们安全的地方,在某种意义上。我还有很多话要说,但我们有一个晚祷,我想我已经说了相当一段时间了。非常感谢。但我不知道是否还有时间……你们想做问答吗?那么,不?是?

We spend a lot of time—many of us spend a lot of time driving—and there’s this phenomenon of road rage. We can get pretty angry or worked up when we’re driving, and that’s because we look at the other drivers as our enemies. We look at the other drivers as if we’re in competition with them, and I think that’s a mistake. It’s because instead of looking at the red light… The red light is your enemy, right? “Oh, it’s been green long enough. It’s turning yellow now. I better hit the gas. I can, right? God forbid I’m stopped at a red light.”

我们花很多时间——我们中很多人花很多时间开车——而且有一种路怒症现象。开车时我们可能会非常生气或激动,那是因为我们把其他司机看作敌人。我们把其他司机看作好像我们在跟他们竞争,我认为那是个错误。这是因为我们没有看向红灯……红灯是你的敌人,对吧?“哦,绿灯已经够久了。现在变黄了。我最好踩油门。我可以,对吧?上帝禁止我在红灯前停下。”

The red light is not your enemy. The red light is your friend. The red light is telling you, “Stop.” What are you going to do? You are going to slow down. Stop at that red light. Slow down. Stop at that red light. How long are you going to be there for? Seconds. That’s where you can stop. Collect yourself. Think about God. Find your heart, enter the place of your heart, and then you go on your way. In other words, think of all of the opportunities that we have in the course of the day to turn our thoughts to God. And instead of doing that, we’re trying to run red lights. Are there any questions? If you have any, you can give them to me now; I can answer them. What do you have?

红灯不是你的敌人。红灯是你的朋友。红灯在告诉你,“停下。”你要做什么?你要减速。在那个红灯前停下。减速。在那个红灯前停下。你会在那里待多久?几秒钟。那就是你可以停下来的地方。整理你自己。想想上帝。找到你的心,进入你心的深处,然后你继续上路。换句话说,想想我们在一天过程中有多少机会将我们的念头转向上帝。但我们没有那样做,而是试图闯红灯。有什么问题吗?如果有,现在可以给我;我可以回答。你有什么?

It’s like the Academy Awards; I’m waiting for the winner to be announced. You want to pick them too, so… Maybe we’ll start with one, and then I can pick up the rest. Do you want me to read it?

这就像奥斯卡颁奖典礼;我在等待获奖者被宣布。你们也想挑问题,所以……也许我们先从一个开始,然后我可以处理剩下的。你想让我读出来吗?

“How do you help your spouse that is not happy or at peace with themselves? How do you get rid of negative thoughts?”

“你如何帮助那些不快乐或内心不平安的配偶?你如何摆脱消极念头?”

I think I answered the second part. You really can’t get rid of the negative thoughts. You can’t get rid of the negative thoughts. The real response, the real solution is you have to stop engaging them. The thoughts are going to be there. It’s up to us whether or not we… Somebody said, even on Mount Athos, airplanes fly overhead, and they make noise sometimes. The thoughts are like the airplanes, but on Mount Athos, they didn’t build an airport. So the thoughts are going to come and go, but don’t build a runway for them. Don’t build a landing strip for them. Don’t welcome them into your heart, no matter what they are.

我想我已经回答了第二部分。你真的无法摆脱消极念头。你无法摆脱消极念头。真正的回应,真正的解决方案是你必须停止参与它们。念头会在那里。是否……取决于我们。有人说,即使在阿索斯山,飞机也会飞过头顶,有时会有噪音。念头就像飞机,但在阿索斯山,他们没有建机场。所以念头会来来去去,但不要为它们建跑道。不要为它们建着陆带。不要欢迎它们进入你的心,无论它们是什么。

The older image that people used to use was the image of the fly. And if you’re sitting in the house and the windows are open in the summertime—and the windows could be the eyes or the ears or the senses—and of course if the windows are open, flies are going to come into your house. And the fly comes into the house, and what does it do? It buzzes around the room a few times. And if the fly doesn’t find anything to eat, it’ll leave. It gets inside the house, doesn’t find anything to eat, and leaves. But if the house is dirty, not only will the fly stay, it will leave its eggs, and then the house will be full of flies. So you can’t prevent the flies from buzzing into your mind, but you can create a pure environment within yourself that doesn’t welcome or accept these things.

人们过去常用的旧意象是苍蝇的意象。如果你坐在屋子里,夏天窗户开着——窗户可能是眼睛、耳朵或感官——当然如果窗户开着,苍蝇会飞进你的屋子。苍蝇进屋后,它做什么?它在房间里嗡嗡飞几次。如果苍蝇没找到吃的,它会离开。它进屋,没找到吃的,然后离开。但如果屋子脏,不仅苍蝇会留下,它还会产卵,然后屋子里就会全是苍蝇。所以你无法防止苍蝇嗡嗡飞进你的心灵,但你可以为自己内在创造一个纯净的环境,不欢迎或接受这些东西。

The other question… All right, why don’t you try to pick some that are most appropriate for the talk? Yeah, another one. I didn’t answer the first question, I mean, about the spouse who’s not at peace. If I’m not at peace, I can’t make you… I mean, how can I possibly? The other thing is that we’re all in different places too, and we have to… You know, when I went to the monastery, I went to the abbot at one point, and I said… and he says, “Look, you want to know why you’re here in the monastery? You’re here to put up with everybody else, and they’re here to put up with you.” And that solved all the problems. You’re here to take care of others, and what about you?

另一个问题……好吧,你们为什么不试着挑一些最适合这次谈话的?是的,再来一个。我没回答第一个问题,我是说,关于那位内心不平安的配偶。如果我自己都不平安,我怎么能让你……我是说,我怎么可能做到?另一件事是,我们也处于不同的境地,我们必须……你知道,当我去修院时,有一次我去找修院院长,我说……他说,“听着,你想知道你为什么来这里修院吗?你来这里是为了容忍其他人,而他们来这里是为了容忍你。”这就解决了所有问题。你来这里是为了照顾他人,那你呢?

When it comes to other people, look, just as sensitive… the most sensitive thing in the world is the heart. The heart of a person is the most sensitive thing. Just a little touch and it’s a disaster. So, we have to be gentle with each other, we have to be patient with each other. The other person is in pain. If the husband or wife is having a hard time, in Greek we don’t say “good patience”; we say “good patience.” Because many need it.

说到他人,看,就像一样敏感……世界上最敏感的东西就是心。人的心是最敏感的东西。轻轻一碰就是灾难。所以,我们必须彼此温柔,彼此忍耐。对方正在痛苦中。如果丈夫或妻子正在经历艰难时刻,在希腊语中,我们不说“好忍耐”;我们说“好忍耐”。因为很多人需要它。

There were a number of good questions, so hopefully I do a good job, and if yours doesn’t get chosen, I’m sorry.

有很多好问题,希望我能处理好,如果你的没被选中,我很抱歉。

“With all the excess and abundance in our everyday lives, and a delusion of the idea of ourselves, how can someone humble themselves to look into the depths of their soul for their salvation?”

“在我们日常生活中所有的过剩和丰裕中,以及对我们自己的观念的错觉下,一个人如何谦卑自己,审视自己灵魂的深处以寻求救赎?”

They say that the devil tries to destroy us through our virtues, and God tries to save us through our vices. The devil tries to destroy us through our virtues. What does that mean? Let’s say if I have a good voice. I’m a good psalter. I have a great voice. That’s a virtue. That’s something good. I have a beautiful voice. If I have a beautiful voice, I can become prideful. And the good thing that God gave me, the beautiful gift that God gave me, the devil will try to use that to destroy me. And we see that all the time. Your gifts, your virtues—that’s why they say you have to repent, not simply of your vices; you have to repent of your virtues sometimes, because you think you’re good, you think you’re right.

人们说,魔鬼试图通过我们的美德摧毁我们,而上帝试图通过我们的恶习拯救我们。魔鬼试图通过我们的美德摧毁我们。那是什么意思?比如说如果我有一副好嗓子。我是个好的诵经员。我有很好的嗓音。那是美德。那是好事。我有美丽的嗓音。如果我有美丽的嗓音,我可能会变得骄傲。上帝给我的好事,上帝给我的美丽恩赐,魔鬼会试图利用它来摧毁我。我们一直看到这种情况。你的恩赐,你的美德——这就是为什么他们说你必须悔改,不仅是为你的恶习;有时你必须为你的美德悔改,因为你认为自己很好,认为自己是对的。

So as the devil tries to destroy us through our good qualities, God tries to save us through our bad qualities, and the difficulties that we have, the mistakes that we make, the failures that we have in our life, our passions—this is the amartia that God allows us to be humbled by our own weaknesses, person who has a character defect or a character flaw.

所以当魔鬼试图通过我们的好品质摧毁我们时,上帝试图通过我们的坏品质拯救我们,以及我们面临的困难,我们犯的错误,我们生活中的失败,我们的情欲——这就是罪,上帝允许我们因自己的软弱而谦卑,尤其是那些有性格缺陷或瑕疵的人。

Let’s say someone who’s an alcoholic. That can be a potentially very dangerous and very damaging thing. And what do they say the person has to do? They have to hit rock bottom. And then there’s an opportunity for them to… “Okay, I realize now just how terrible this is, and I realize now that… this is done. I can’t do this anymore.” So that’s an example of how a vice, a passion, an addictive behavior, a self-destructive behavior reached a kind of limit and it became its own teacher in a way. “I can’t live with this anymore.” And God has a blessing. And people say, how about sometimes people get diseases and they understand that they’re blessings from God. They said, “The alcoholism was terrible, but I hit rock bottom and it was the best thing that ever happened to me. Or when the doctor told me that I had cancer, it was the best thing that ever happened to me. Because I wasn’t living my life properly. I didn’t know what was important in my life. My priorities were all upside down. And when the doctor told me what he told me, then I understood what life means. It’s a blessing.” So God is the one who will bring these things about for us. Do you have another one? Do you have any good ones? Time? Time is something you control. There were a few on this subject, so I think I’ll consolidate them into one. What is the church’s stance on secular teachings, on thoughts, self-development, etc.? Can they work in tandem? And I’ll add that there were a couple in terms of the practice of physical meditation, yoga, etc.

比如说,一个酗酒的人。那可能是一件非常危险且极具破坏性的事情。人们常说这个人必须做什么呢?他们必须跌入谷底。然后他们才有了一个机会……“好吧,我现在意识到这有多糟糕,我现在意识到……这结束了。我再也无法这样下去了。”所以这是一个例子,说明一种恶习、一种情欲、一种成瘾行为、一种自我毁灭的行为如何达到了一种极限,并在某种程度上成为了它自己的老师。“我再也无法带着这个生活下去了。”而上帝自有祝福。人们会说,有时候人们患上疾病,他们却明白那是来自上帝的祝福。他们说:“酗酒很可怕,但我跌入了谷底,那是发生在我身上最好的事情。或者当医生告诉我我得了癌症时,那是发生在我身上最好的事情。”因为我没有正确地生活。我不知道什么是我生命中重要的。我的优先次序全都颠倒了。当医生告诉我他所告诉我的之后,我明白了生命意味着什么。这是一个祝福。所以上帝是为我们促成这些事情的那一位。你还有另一个问题吗?你有什么好问题吗?时间?时间是你可以掌控的东西。关于这个主题有几个问题,所以我想我把它们合并成一个。教会对世俗教导、思想、自我发展等的立场是什么?它们能协同工作吗?我还要补充一点,有关于身体默念、瑜伽等实践的几个问题。

When I first heard the question, I thought it was about psychology. And I think that principal psychology is a very vast and variegated field. We refer to it with one word, but there are so many schools of psychological thought that it’s really inexact to speak of psychology in general. But having said that, I’ll do it anyway. I think that the best that psychology has to offer is actually good, and that many people have been helped by counselors and psychologists and psychiatrists. Just as the body can get sick with disease, the brain is part of the body, and the brain can. I mean, there’s obviously a certain percentage of people who have organic brain disorders or chemical imbalances. It’s just part of the way we get sick. It’s part of the way things go wrong and those people can be helped by counseling and even medication. I think at least in the US we’ve gone way too far with this and we’re over diagnosing people with the smallest kinds of neuroses and problems and the answer to everything now is to get everybody on drugs. Because the pharmaceutical companies make a lot of money and it’s all like that. But if you look at the positive achievements of psychology and psychiatry, we should welcome them because they can really help people that can’t otherwise be helped. But having said that, we also have to recognize that psychology and psychiatry have their limitations. They’re dealing with the emotional and the psychological aspect of the person. And often, this is the problem with medicine today, they’re usually just treating symptoms. They’re not getting at the deeper. Often there’s a spiritual cause or there’s something. So I think there needs to be a combination of the spiritual together with. Just like if a person has a physical problem, the priest wouldn’t say, “No, just go pray about it.” He would say, “No, you go to the doctor.” It’s very simple; we overcomplicate it, I think.

当我第一次听到这个问题时,我以为它是关于心理学的。我认为主要心理学是一个非常广阔且多样的领域。我们用一个词来指代它,但有太多的心理学思想流派,以至于笼统地谈论心理学确实是不准确的。但话虽如此,我还是会这么做。我认为心理学所能提供的最好的东西实际上是好的,许多人得到了咨询师、心理学家和精神科医生的帮助。就像身体会患病一样,大脑是身体的一部分,大脑也会生病。我的意思是,显然有一定比例的人患有器质性脑疾病或化学失衡。这只是我们生病方式的一部分。这是事情出错方式的一部分,这些人可以通过咨询甚至药物得到帮助。我认为至少在美国,我们在这方面走得太远了,我们对最轻微的神经症和问题过度诊断,现在对所有问题的答案就是让每个人都服药。因为制药公司赚了很多钱,一切都是这样。但如果你看看心理学和精神病学的积极成就,我们应该欢迎它们,因为它们真的可以帮助那些否则无法帮助的人。但话虽如此,我们也必须认识到心理学和精神病学有其局限性。它们处理的是人的情感和心理方面。而且通常,这是当今医学的问题,它们通常只是治疗症状。它们没有触及更深层的东西。通常有一个属灵的原因或其他什么。所以我认为需要将属灵的与医疗结合起来。就像如果一个人有身体问题,神父不会说,“不,只管去为此祷告。”他会说,“不,你去看医生。”这很简单;我想是我们把它复杂化了。

As far as the other things go, meditation and yoga, and I have a question about all of those things, and I question the appropriateness of those things for Orthodox Christians or for any Christian. They present themselves as exercise, they present themselves as stress relief, and everyone’s stressed out, but they are really the vestiges, anyway, of the spiritual practices of another religion. And there are many yoga teachers who are attracted to yoga and they’re attracted to eastern religions and they’ll teach their yoga class, they’ll give people mantras. It’s not everybody does this, but some do. But I think if you want to exercise, that’s great. I would encourage you to exercise. I see no reason why we have to be going to other religious traditions to relieve stress. And I know that yoga is popular and that many people go to yoga classes and what I’m saying might be looked at as narrow-minded or obscurantist or negative, but I genuinely feel that way. I just don’t think that I could do that. I couldn’t go to a yoga class. And how would you feel if I did that? What would you think about me? I couldn’t go to yoga and do what? And place my body and spirit in submission to Someone who’s going to tell me do this and do that. And what do they do? My body is not my own. My body belongs to the church. My body belongs to the body of Christ. That’s not my body to go now to deposit at the feet of a spiritual teacher from India or Southeast Asia or… All world religions have things of value in them. But I think to do this is to cross a line. And it’s not necessary. And actually, I read a book a while ago, I forget the title of it, I’m sorry.

至于其他事情,默念和瑜伽,我对所有这些事情都有疑问,我质疑这些事情对东正教基督徒或任何基督徒的适宜性。它们把自己表现为运动,表现为压力缓解,每个人都压力很大,但它们实际上是另一种宗教的属灵实践的残余。有许多瑜伽老师被瑜伽吸引,他们被东方宗教吸引,他们会教瑜伽课,他们会给人咒语。不是每个人都这样做,但有些人会。但我认为如果你想运动,那很好。我会鼓励你运动。我看不到我们为什么要去其他宗教传统来缓解压力。我知道瑜伽很流行,很多人去上瑜伽课,我所说的可能会被视为狭隘或蒙昧主义或消极,但我确实是这种感觉。我只是觉得我做不到那样。我不能去上瑜伽课。如果我那样做,你会有什么感觉?你会怎么看我?我不能去瑜伽做什么?并将我的身体和灵顺服于某个会告诉我做这个做那个的人。他们做什么?我的身体不属于我自己。我的身体属于教会。我的身体属于基督的身体。那不是我的身体,可以现在去放置在来自印度或东南亚的属灵老师的脚下……所有世界宗教都有其有价值的东西。但我认为这样做是越界了。而且这是没必要的。实际上,我前不久读过一本书,我忘了书名了,抱歉。

But it’s about the history of modern yoga. And the yoga that we’re familiar with in the Western world is actually a fairly recent phenomenon. It was invented in India in the late 19th, early 20th century by a group of Hindu religious leaders who were upset and concerned about the presence of British Protestant missionaries in India. You had lots of Indians converting to Christianity under the British, and these Indian religious leaders were naturally concerned about this. So what did they do? They created this whole system of modern yoga as a way to combat actually Christianity. Obviously yoga has roots in much older Indian traditions, but the form of modern yoga that is practiced today goes back to Vivekananda. There’s a whole history here; we’re not here to talk about that. But the very idea that it was created to combat Christianity is enough, I think, to make any Christian question becoming an adept, let’s say, at that practice. So anyway, it’s a whole other worldview. It’s a whole other worldview. I know I lost a few people with that one, but I was going to ask one final question. But because of that, after Father’s answer, maybe we’ll ask two, and His Grace will say a few words and we’ll all go downstairs. How important is teaching Hesychasm to young children? What could it look like in the household?

但这关乎现代瑜伽的历史。而我们在西方世界所熟悉的瑜伽,实际上是一个相当近期的现象。它是由一群印度教宗教领袖在 19 世纪末 20 世纪初于印度发明的,他们对英国新教传教士出现在印度感到不安和担忧。当时有很多印度人在英国统治下改信基督教,这些印度宗教领袖自然对此感到担忧。那么他们做了什么?他们创造了整个现代瑜伽体系,实际上是为了对抗基督教。显然瑜伽植根于更古老的印度传统,但今天所练习的现代瑜伽形式可追溯到维韦卡南达。这里有一段完整的历史;我们不是来谈那个的。但仅仅是它被创造出来对抗基督教这一想法,我认为就足以让任何基督徒质疑是否要精通该练习。总之,这是完全不同的世界观。这是完全不同的世界观。我知道这番话让有些人听不进去了,但我本来想问最后一个问题。但鉴于此,在神父回答之后,也许我们会问两个问题,然后主教阁下说几句,我们就都下楼去。向幼童教导静修主义有多重要?在家庭中会是什么样子?

Children learn by example. We are our parents’ children. What our parents did, how they behaved in the home, how they related to each other—that’s what we learn. What they tell us, that sort of goes in one ear and out the other. How do they say? They say, “I’d rather see a sermon than hear one.” Have you heard that one before? And so, who the parents are and how they live, that’s what the children see. That’s what they pick up on. They’re already genetically predisposed anyway because they’re your children. So if the parents don’t have a spiritual life, if the parents aren’t people of prayer, if the parents aren’t people of faith, it doesn’t matter what you tell your kids. Are you going to tell your kid to go to…? I used to see this. Parents would drop their kids off to church for Sunday school. They would go and get pancakes and then pick them up. Whatever they learned in Sunday school, the real lesson was: church is not that important because my parents don’t go, or Daddy doesn’t go, or Mommy doesn’t go, and so on. And if you are that living example of faith and of belief, and if your heart is open to God, your children will see that. Even if you never say a word about it, your children will see that; they will experience that. God will take care of that; God will communicate to them. Of course, you want to teach them and take them to church, right? But children are very sensitive too. Children, especially younger people, teenagers, adolescents, are very, very sensitive to injustice and hypocrisy. You smoke. The father says, “You shouldn’t smoke.” “Well, you smoke, Dad.” They’re very sensitive to the hypocrisy that fills our world. So, raising children is probably the most important thing that any human… that’s greater than anything in the world: to bring another person into the world and to raise that person right. That’s got to be the greatest challenge. That’s another life that God has given you for you to raise. And if the example isn’t there, if the example of love and forgiveness and patience… and now we have kids telling their parents what to do. The whole world is upside down. So if the parents go to church and receive communion, the children will learn that and follow along. Now there might come a time—we have this thing in our culture where the kids feel they have to rebel—and okay, they might do that. They might say, “I don’t want to go to church anymore.” But you know, they’ll come back if you’ve given them that foundation, right? They will realize, “My mother was right, my father was right. All those years I didn’t understand it, but… because that’s the right thing to do.” So, you don’t want to be too heavy-handed either. You don’t want to be kind of imposing and forcing and, you know, sit down and say your Jesus prayers. It’s not supposed to be punishment, right? But at a particular point, our children should learn how to pray. They should know that they should experience the reality of God, and they should experience the grace of God, and the love of God, and the compassion of God, and the freedom and the joy that comes from knowing God. That’s what prayer is. We have this idea about a rule of prayer. Nobody likes rules. I don’t like rules, right? I’m an American. Americans don’t like rules. It’s coloring in the lines and all of that. To say it’s a prayer rule, that’s not necessarily the best way. Kanonas, it’s a little bit different. In English, “a rule”… you pray to God because you love God. Not because you have to, or somebody told you to, or it’s a rule. Okay, sometimes it’s good to have the discipline, but that’s not the motivation.

孩子通过榜样学习。我们是父母的孩子。父母做了什么,在家中如何行事,如何彼此相处——那就是我们所学到的。他们告诉我们的话,往往是左耳进右耳出。人们怎么说?他们说,“我宁愿看到一篇讲道,也不愿听到一篇。”你们以前听过这句话吗?所以,父母是什么样的人以及如何生活,那是孩子所看到的。那是他们领会到的。反正他们天生就有倾向,因为他们是你的孩子。所以如果父母没有属灵生活,如果父母不是祷告的人,如果父母不是有信仰的人,你告诉孩子什么都没用的。你会告诉你的孩子去……吗?我以前见过这种情况。父母会把孩子送到教会参加主日学。他们自己去吃煎饼,然后再来接孩子。无论他们在主日学到了什么,真正的教训是:教会不重要,因为我的父母不去,或者爸爸不去,或者妈妈不去,等等。如果你是信仰和信念的活榜样,如果你的心向上帝敞开,你的孩子会看到的。即使你从未就此说一个字,你的孩子也会看到;他们会体验到。上帝会照顾这一点;上帝会与他们沟通。当然,你想教导他们并带他们去教会,对吧?但孩子也非常敏感。孩子,尤其是年轻人、青少年、 adolescents,对不公和虚伪非常非常敏感。你抽烟。父亲说,“你不该抽烟。”“好吧,爸爸,你也抽烟。”他们对充斥我们世界的虚伪非常敏感。所以,养育孩子可能是任何人类……比世界上任何事都更重要的事:将另一个人带到世上并正确地养育那个人。这必须是最大的挑战。那是上帝赐予你养育的另一个生命。如果没有榜样,如果没有仁爱、宽恕和忍耐的榜样……现在却是孩子告诉父母该做什么。整个世界都颠倒了。所以如果父母去教会并领受圣体圣事,孩子会学到并跟随。现在可能会有一个时刻——我们的文化中有这种现象,孩子觉得他们必须叛逆——好吧,他们可能会那样做。他们可能会说,“我不想再去教会了。”但你知道,如果你给了他们那个基础,他们会回来的,对吧?他们会意识到,“我母亲是对的,我父亲是对的。那些年我不理解,但……因为那是正确的事。”所以,你也不想太强硬。你不想某种程度上的强加和强迫,你知道,坐下来念你的耶稣祷文。这不应该是惩罚,对吧?但在某个特定阶段,我们的孩子应该学习如何祷告。他们应该知道他们应该体验上帝的真实,体验上帝的恩典,上帝的仁爱,上帝的怜悯,以及认识上帝所带来的自由和喜乐。那就是祷告是什么。我们有关于祈祷规则的这个想法。没人喜欢规则。我不喜欢规则,对吧?我是美国人。美国人不喜欢规则。那是条条框框之类的。说它是祈祷规则,未必是最好的方式。圣颂典,有点不同。在英语中,“规则”……你向上帝祷告是因为你爱上帝。不是因为你必须,或有人告诉你,或这是个规则。好吧,有时候有纪律是好的,但那不是动机。

Elder Emiliano of Simanopada, I used to say all the time: if I walked into a crowded room, if I walked into a room and there were 500 people in that room, and if there was one person in that room, one person in that room that I loved, where do you think I’m going to go? I’m going to make a beeline for that person. I’m going to have to say hello to you and shake your hand. The whole time, my mind is on the one person in the room that I love, and that’s where I want to be. You want to be where love is. And that’s what prayer is. You go to your icons in your house not because someone told you to, or because that’s what’s right to do, or someone gave you a rule. You go there because you want to be where love is. That’s where love is. You go where God is. You go there so that your heart can rest in God, so that you can bask in God’s love and be in that place. That’s why you go. You can’t feel that way 24 hours a day, and that’s why a prayer rule is good. Because that’ll keep you going. Just like in a relationship, not every day of married life is a honeymoon. When the strong feelings of love aren’t there, I’m still here. We’re still together because we’re committed. I don’t just love you because I feel like loving you today. I love you because that’s what we’ve agreed to do. That’s who we are now. But we don’t want to ever forget the real reason we come to church is to be with the Lord, to be with God in that place of love. That’s another thing.

西马诺帕达的艾米利安长老,我以前常说:如果我走进一个拥挤的房间,如果我走进一个房间,里面有 500 个人,而在这个房间里,有一个人,房间里的那一个人是我所爱的,你觉得我会去哪里?我会径直走向那个人。我必须向你问好,和你握手。但 throughout 整个过程,我的心思都在房间里我所爱的那一个人身上,那就是我想去的地方。你想待在爱所在的地方。这就是祈祷。你走到家里的圣像前,不是因为有人告诉你这么做,或者因为那是正确的事,或者有人给了你一条规则。你去那里是因为你想待在爱所在的地方。爱就在那里。你走到上帝所在的地方。你去那里,是为了让你的心在上帝里面安息,为了让你沐浴在上帝的爱中,待在那个地方。这就是你去的原因。你不可能一天 24 小时都有那种感觉,这就是为什么祈祷规则是好的。因为它会让你坚持下去。就像在一段关系中,婚姻生活的每一天并不都是蜜月。当强烈的爱意不在时,我仍然在这里。我们仍然在一起,因为我们有承诺。我爱你不仅仅是因为我今天感觉想爱你。我爱你,因为这是我们约定要做的事。这就是我们现在的身份。但我们不想忘记,我们来到教会的真正原因是与主同在,在那个爱的地方与上帝同在。这是另一件事。

Vageli, you’re tiring the world out. No more questions? We’ll go with one more. I’m sorry. Forgive me. That was a great answer. It’s a great way to close the segment. But I already said to whoever this is, hopefully they appreciate the father’s answers. I’m sure they will.

瓦格利,你把世界都累坏了。没有问题了吗?我们再来一个。对不起。请原谅我。那是一个很好的回答。这是结束这个环节的很好的方式。但我已经对这位提问者说了,希望他们能领会神父的回答。我相信他们会。

Once we quiet our minds, which kind of relates to what you were saying just now, what questions can we ask ourselves to find out who we are? Think about the way that question is structured. The whole problem is the way I’m thinking. It’s all of these thoughts. If I create a space for myself and I bring those thoughts into that space, it’s still me. In other words, people say, “You have to think out of the box.” Have you heard that expression? “You have to think outside of the box.” The problem is what? The problem is that thinking is the box. In other words, it’s that same voice. It’s that same question. Who’s asking those questions? It’s that same sinful voice. It’s the clouds that are speaking. Take the clouds and bring the clouds down here. The idea is to be done with all of those things. In other words, when I stand in the presence of God, I don’t have my thoughts there, because if the thoughts are there, I’m not with God. I’m with the thoughts. They say the thoughts are all thieves, because they steal the idea of God from you. In other words, if I’m with someone that I love and all of a sudden I’m thinking about other things, it’s like I’m not there anymore. When we’re with God, what we strive for is not so much… I’m not saying don’t think about yourself and don’t ask questions about yourself. That’s unavoidable. We do that. But in these deeper moments of prayer, that’s not the place to think about myself now. No, because you’re with God. You’re in the middle of that relationship. Agapas totheo.

一旦我们让我们的心灵安静下来,这与你刚才所说的有些关联,我们可以问自己什么问题来找出我们是谁?想想这个问题的结构方式。整个问题在于我的思维方式。都是这些念头。如果我为自己创造一个空间,把这些念头带入那个空间,那仍然是我。换句话说,人们说,“你必须跳出框框思考。”你听过这个表达吗?“你必须跳出框框思考。”问题是什么?问题在于,思考本身就是那个框框。换句话说,那是同一个声音。那是同一个问题。是谁在问这些问题?是同一个罪恶的声音。是云彩在说话。把云彩带到这里来。想法是要摆脱所有这些东西。换句话说,当我站在上帝的同在中时,我没有把我的念头带在那里,因为如果念头在那里,我就没有与上帝同在。我是与念头同在。他们说念头都是贼,因为它们从你那里偷走了上帝的概念。换句话说,如果我和我所爱的人在一起,突然我开始想别的事情,就像我不再在那里了一样。当我们与上帝在一起时,我们努力追求的并不是那么……我不是说不要思考自己,不要问关于自己的问题。那是不可避免的。我们会这样做。但在这些更深层的祈祷时刻,那不是思考自己的地方。不,因为你与上帝同在。你处于那段关系的中间。你爱上帝(Agapas totheo)。

Again, Elder Milianos had a great image. He said, let’s say I’m walking down the road, going to my friend’s house. I’m thinking, “How nice it will be at my friend’s house. He’s made a nice meal, we’ll listen to some nice music, maybe we’ll watch a movie.” My mind is wandering and I’m imagining all of the nice things that are going to… All of a sudden I look up and a few paces in front of me on the road there’s a lion. He says at that moment I’m not thinking about the dinner and the music. All I’m thinking about is the fact that there’s a lion on the road. It’s staring at me, and now it starts to walk toward me. The next thing I know, his face is right up to my face. Am I thinking about anything else? Even myself? What am I? Because then he says, “What if… What if the lion swallows me whole?” The lion is God. When you’re in the presence of God. Let me ask you something. You’re a skeptic. I’m describing an intense situation, but that’s the ideal. To answer the question, I think that when we put ourselves on a spiritual path, when we move in the direction of God, and when we do the right things in our life, those questions will be answered spontaneously. In other words, I don’t know who I am apart from God. I can’t answer the question of who I am independently of God. It’s only in relationship to God that I can discover who I am. What do we say? We say that the human person is the image of God. In other words, like a copy; the original is God and we are the ikones. There is an icon; there is the prototype.

再次,艾米利安长老有一个很好的意象。他说,假设我正走在路上,去我朋友家。我在想,“在我朋友家该多好。他准备了美餐,我们会听些好听的音乐,也许我们会看部电影。”我的思绪飘忽,想象着所有即将发生的美好事情……突然我抬起头,就在前方几步远的路上,有一只狮子。他说,那一刻我不再想着晚餐和音乐。我所有想的都是路上有一只狮子。它盯着我,现在它开始向我走来。接下来我知道,它的脸就在我的脸前。我还在想别的事吗?甚至想我自己?我是什么?因为接着他说,“如果……如果狮子把我整个吞下怎么办?”狮子就是上帝。当你处于上帝的同在中时。让我问你一件事。你是个怀疑论者。我在描述一个紧张的情况,但那是理想状态。要回答这个问题,我认为当我们把自己放在属灵道路上,当我们朝向上帝的方向移动,当我们在生活中做正确的事情时,这些问题会自发地得到解答。换句话说,除了上帝,我不知道我是谁。我无法独立于上帝来回答我是谁这个问题。只有在与上帝的关系中,我才能发现我是谁。我们怎么说?我们说人是上帝的形象。换句话说,就像复制品;原件是上帝,我们是圣像。这里有圣像;那里有原型。

So how can you know the truth of the image if you don’t know the archetype, if you don’t know the source of the image? If I have a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy, I can’t read it; I have to get the original. So that’s how I figure out who I am. That’s how I come to know who I am, when I enter more deeply, not into myself, but into the reality of God.

那么,如果你不知道原型,如果你不知道图像的源头,你怎么能知道图像的真伪呢?如果我有一份复印件的复印件的复印件,我无法阅读它;我必须得到原件。所以我就是这样弄清楚我是谁的。这就是我认识我是谁的方式,当我更深入地进入时,不是进入我自己,而是进入上帝的实相。

Is that it? You’re going to close it? Thank you so much, Father Maximus, for that really deep, spiritual, enlightening homily and questions and answers to the questions from the parishioners gathered here this evening. I think we’ve all been very much edified during this important Lent period, and we thank you very much for coming here from Boston, for making the time, and for enlightening us with your words and your examples, and, of course, strengthening our relationship with Christ above all. I want to give the last word, and we’re almost there. I want to give the last word to His Grace, Bishop Christoforos, who is also blessing us with his presence here today, so he can also thank Father Maximus and say a few short words. Your Grace.

就这样吗?你要结束了吗?非常感谢你,马克西姆神父,为了今晚聚集在这里的平信徒所提出的问题和答案,以及那真正深刻、属灵、具有启发性的讲道。我想在这个重要的大斋期期间,我们都受益匪浅,非常感谢你从波士顿来到这里,抽出时间,用你的言语和榜样启发我们,当然,最重要的是加强我们与基督的关系。我想把最后的话语权交给别人,我们也快结束了。我想把最后的话语权交给主教阁下,克里斯托弗罗斯主教,他今天也亲临此地祝福我们,以便他也能感谢马克西姆神父并说几句简短的话。主教阁下。

On behalf of His Eminence Metropolitan Sotirios, I would like to welcome Father Maximus to our metropolis and to thank him personally for his lovely speech about Logism. I don’t know, Father Maximus, if you have searched this area: the ancient philosopher Plato, who spoke about the world of ideas, if they have something related with the world of ideas which are eternal. And also, I know that on Mount Athos, when the monks go for confession, they don’t say, “I am going to confess,” but they say, “I want to say my Logismos,” which is very important in the spiritual life. Also, I thank very much Father Fanourios, the pious priest who organized, under the blessing of our metropolis, this spiritual opportunity in the midst of the Great Lent, which is so necessary to help us to grow our spiritual life in this holy period. When I was in Essex sometime, I heard Fr. Sofroni who spoke about Logismi. And what I remember from that speech is, if a priest is in the middle before the Holy Altar and he accepts an attack by adaptation, what does he have to do? He says, in this crucial moment, he has to pray to God and to say to Him, “My Father, look at him, and You? Discuss with God.” So, to avoid and to pass the temptation there. By this, he will be released from this temptation and he continues his service. Again, I thank Fr. Maximus who came to this Holy Church, which is connected with me personally, as he says that his former name was Nicholas. But also, I am connected with this church because I have been ordained here as a bishop 16, 17 years ago, a long time. Thank you, all of you who came here, and I wish this holy speech to have roots in our spiritual life, especially in this holy land we pass through. Thank you.

我代表都主教阁下索蒂里奥斯,欢迎马克西姆神父来到我们的都主教区,并亲自感谢他关于妄念的精彩演讲。我不知道,马克西姆神父,你是否研究过这个领域:古代哲学家柏拉图,他谈到了理念世界,它们是否与永恒的理念世界有关。此外,我知道在阿索斯山,当修士去告解时,他们不说“我要去告解”,而是说“我想诉说我的妄念”,这在属灵生活中非常重要。此外,我非常感谢法努里奥斯神父,这位虔诚的神父在我们都主教区的祝福下,组织了这次大斋期中的属灵机会,这对于帮助我们在这一神圣时期成长我们的属灵生活是非常必要的。当我有时在埃塞克斯时,我听到索弗罗尼神父谈论妄念。我从那次演讲中记得的是,如果一位神父在圣祭坛中间,他受到诱惑的攻击,他该怎么办?他说,在这个关键时刻,他必须向上帝祈祷,并对祂说:“阿爸父,看着他,而你呢?与上帝交谈。”所以,为了避免并度过那里的诱惑。通过这种方式,他将从这诱惑中得释放,并继续他的服事。再次感谢马克西姆神父来到这座圣教会,这与我个人有关联,因为他说他以前的名字是尼古拉。而且,我与这座教会也有联系,因为我在 16、17 年前在这里被祝圣为主教,很久了。感谢所有来到这里的人,我希望这篇神圣的讲道能在我们的属灵生活中扎根,特别是在我们经过的这片圣地。谢谢。

One more minute, promise. Thank you so much, Your Grace. Everyone is invited downstairs in the church hall for some charisma that the community is offering, and I want to thank the community council. I want to thank our Philoptochos, who always work so tirelessly, as all Philoptochos do across our holy metropolis. You’re all invited downstairs. For those interested, Father Maximus will be celebrating the Divine Liturgy with Father Hadidimos tomorrow at All Saints at Bayview, south of Finch. So he’ll be there for the Divine Liturgy. Also, for those interested, this homily will be available through the Metropolis’ Facebook and YouTube channel. So if you’re not already there, you can visit it. And, of course, you can visit our Metropolis’ website, and there’s a special section there, not only for this talk, but also for Great Lent, with a lot of spiritual nourishment for the entire Lenten and Holy Week period. Once again, I want to thank everyone for making the time in this distracted world to spend some time here with us. Hopefully, you were mentally here along with physically. I want to thank, of course, above all, His Eminence Metropolitan Sotirios, His Grace here, and, of course, Father Maximus, for once again coming and giving us such spiritual recharging for our spiritual batteries. Thank you, and Kali Anastasi.

再一分钟,保证。非常感谢,主教阁下。邀请大家下楼到教堂大厅,享用社区提供的一些茶点,我要感谢社区委员会。我要感谢我们的慈善会,她们总是如此不知疲倦地工作,就像我们神圣都主教区的所有慈善会成员一样。大家都被邀请下楼。对于有兴趣的人,马克西姆神父明天将与哈迪迪莫斯神父在芬奇街以南的湾景区诸圣堂共同举行圣礼仪。所以他将会在那里举行圣礼仪。此外,对于有兴趣的人,这篇讲道将通过都主教区的 Facebook 和 YouTube 频道提供。所以如果你还没有关注,可以去看看。当然,你可以访问我们都主教区的网站,那里有一个特别版块,不仅针对这次讲座,也针对大斋期,为整个大斋期和圣周期间提供许多属灵滋养。再次,我要感谢大家在这个分心的世界里抽出时间与我们在这里共度时光。希望你们身心都在这里。当然,我最想感谢的是都主教阁下索蒂里奥斯,这里的主教阁下,当然还有马克西姆神父,再次来到这里,为我们的属灵电池如此充电。谢谢,基督复活了。